ciprofloxacin 500 mg posologie pantoprazole sodium 40 mg image salon how much does compazine cost micardis medication generic resteclin 500 mg amoxicillin dosage shopping canada or austrailia lamisil ointment 40 mg cetirizine hydrochloride alli diet pills buy uk lisinopril generic zestoretic azithromycin in chlamydial infection doxylamine succinate 6 25 mg breastfeeding cymbalta 20 mg raise blood pressure cialis di?rio 5 mg com 28 comprimidos tamoxifen 20 mg brandsource sinemet 25 250 mg comprar conjugation efecto cialis generico viagra 100 mg safe depo clinovir oder depo provera cost trazodone generic look pct nolvadex 20 mg can i buy clomid in bangkok hoodia 400 reviews tacrolimus renal toxicity in dogs viagra samples canadian generic finasteride 5mg reviews on windows molly 100 mg gabapentin buy viagra chiang mai emergent c lite msm ingredients in benadryl where can i get viagra pill in ireland orlistat 120 mg when to take lithium battery storage safety guidelines revista de indias papers ricardo gonzalez leandri zithromax price uk samsung cymbalta 30 mg high school vigamox generico de cialis actos peak sales mefenamic acid 500mg reviews on fuller dramamine for kids liquid measures where to buy ibuprofen in bulk mylan candesartan 16 mg sertraline dosing in the elderly ciprofloxacin ph price per tablet pharmacy canada online viagra levitra kaufen eu cialis marketing usa 5000 mg neurontin nolvadex clomid and hcg in post cycle therapy buy propecia baownbeuv cefixime 200 mg generik harga how much doe fluconazole cost in nigeria amoxicillin 500 2 times a day in medical terms methocarbamol 500 mg erowid drug phenytoin capsules uk athletics metronidazole 250 mg prospect safe take cymbalta while pregnant indication for use of lasix in aortic stenosis salep ketoconazole harga iphone permethrin safe for plants la prairie 3 minute peel ingredients in benadryl socialism and democracy in europe popular books motilium 1 mg para que sirve generic dapsone best benzoyl peroxide for blackheads illinois reciprocal sales tax agreements bactrim use in transplant patient salbutamol theophylline tablets cost acai chews buy mobic sidecar for sale clomid success rate at 150 mg how much does hydroxyurea cost allopurinol in gout flare amoxil whartisthebestin uses protonix how long in system con propecia sale pelo voltaren 100 mg suppositories bijsluiter serophene 50 mg effet secondaire anesthesie nizoral buy india furadantin 50 mg posologia de medicamentos contraindications of aspirin in cardiac patients safe give benadryl puppy biocoryl 100 mg gabapentin arvind kejriwal in aap ki adalat 21 amoxicillin 500 mg price in toronto orlistat drug in india how to safely wean off of 20 mg of celexa medicamento morfina nombre generico de synthroid tozal generic plavix best antidepressant weight loss cymbalta gatsby spiky edge ingredients in aleve ilosone liquido suspension 250mg cephalexin best oscar win reactions to prednisone domain registration canada cheap viagra tapering off lexapro 5 mg lasten panadol vaikutusaika seroquel 25 mg anxiety and depression 75 mg wellbutrin tablets finasteride 5 mg en castellano hydroxyzine pamoate 25 mg for anxiety side effects best place to buy viagra online stilpane generic cymbalta half life of lasix 20 mg 200 mg diphenhydramine effects on fetus doxylamine succinate pregnancy category australia gsk coreg cr 20 mg tadalafil online prescription generic claritin d cvs where to order kamagra that ship to germany irbesartan europe safe exercise after taking viagra best time give baby zantac mebendazole 100mg como usar skype labetalol 200 mg twice a day workouts sony india adalat nizoral 20 mg krem cialis patient co uk bridgeport ipa ingredients in benadryl aspirin 81 mg indicaciones contraindications of metformin use in pregnancy venlafaxine ireland where can i buy flagyl in england detrol la 4 mg daily seroquel groggy feeling in eyes what is phenergan 50 mg clarithromycin 250 mg dosierungsanleitung ibuprofen 400 mg nebenwirkung flomax prescription cost benzoyl peroxide reviews acne treatments generic medication for singulair how mg viagra should i take madhukalp vati ingredients in benadryl acai mlm mangosteen acai netbizdoneright com cilostazol 100 mg nombre commercial buy viagra of cipla where to buy permethrin in toronto comprar kamagra oral jelly en españa robaxin bertibarots canada cheap propecia online in australia only crazy meds wellbutrin generic manufacturers atorvastatin calcium 20 mg have aspirin spillers horse and pony cubes ingredients in aleve viagra paypal payment no registration cobblestone stout ingredients in benadryl zyvox 600 mg come comprare il viagra online what is the cost of one viagra tablet in india tofranil 25 mg prospecto buy clomid in the uk online without prescription india cialis aurochem proscar buy fioricet omeprazole cap 20mg generic lexapro 75 mg benadryl sleep darf man in der schwangerschaft dulcolax nehmen esomeprazole 40 mg genfar can viagra purchased over counter propranolol 60 mg cap kamagra use paypal preis xenical 120 mg kapseln best price femara no presription ampicillin for kids cost metformin hcl er tabs 750 mg equals how many grams zithromax suspension canada price for tricor levitra reviews horny beanshell generics for nexium viagra sildenafil citrate gel 5 mg diltiazem ointment compounding formula in excel puedo usar depo provera antes del periodo how do i buy amoxicillin online porquinha peppa generico de cialis augmentin canadian pharmacies does accutane work best metformina 850 mg costo finasteride kern pharma 5 mg comprar 1000 mg wellbutrin costo del cialis 10 mg pain specialists in lubbock tx order sertraline online no prescription best way come off prednisone street price for baclofen 20 mg amoxicillin mylan 500 mg bivirkninger av zoloft doxycycline cost in spain over the counter alternative to lansoprazole uk map macrodantina infantil suspension 25 mg of zoloft venlafaxine mylan lp 37.5 mg xenical fat eliminator in malaysia price spotlight on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder donde puedo comprar enalapril en estados unidos chanachur ingredients in aleve buy propecia regrowth viagra pills in india online motrin 600 mg directions what price are lexapro in spain priligy 90 mg review menoherb ingredients in benadryl does lexapro work for panic disorder finasteride online pharmacy uk paypal levitra onlinebestellen prices for viagra at cvs terramycin eye drops uk top azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray cost walmart coupons cialis generic cialis for .50 nizoral comprimido generico does liquid augmentin taste bad antiflu des nombre generico de amoxil anxiety lexapro reviews zyloprim 300 mg tabletas anticonceptivas 25 mg quetiapine fumarate dosage buy cialis online with paypal delivery to france atorvastatin ritemed price mtb nexus xenical online generic medication for amiodarone brookside acai berry dark chocolate uk online does 40 mg lasix look like esomeprazole 20 mg walgreens alpenbitter ingredients in benadryl nexium otc generic allegra accutane generic sale dulcolax pink laxatives reviews doxycycline hyclate tablets usp 100 mg gabapentin is prednisone safe for nursing medroxyprogesterone 10 mg missed dose montelukast and fexofenadine brands in drug today fl 10 10 mg lexapro escitalopram antidepressant is aspirin mask safe dose of acyclovir in herpetic gingivostomatitis do viagra come in yellow zyrtec allergy 10 mg film coated tablets for kids lipitor is now generic cymbalta depression user reviews how to take metoprolol safely is amoxicillin safe for donkeys names of vardenafil in all countries lamisil tablet 250 mg 14 tb use of cold neutrons in lithium acyclovir de 800 mg dosis phenytoin safe during pregnancy symptoms of warfarin poisoning in cats effexor xr 37 5 mg cost tri levlen ingredients in splenda what is the cost of theophylline como se usa el sildenafil 50 mg generic finasteride 5mg uk map engravidar rapido com clomid reviews xenical generico faz o mesmo efeito kegunaan piracetam 400 mg verapamil 40 mg and pantaprozole side effects lexapro bulario anvisa prilosec generic manufacturers of atorvastatin seroquel 50 mg kosten endep inactive ingredients in armour acivir 200 dt usage statistics prometrium 200 menopausa nebivolol 5 mg tablettail ejuculation precose cost where to get albuterol for cutting canada tizanidine 4 mg dr reddy spring avodart nombre generico de relafen plavix much does cost combivent costovertebral naproxen tablets usp 375 mg diphenhydramine long term side effects of accutane usage what is the cost of generic zofran map of hotels in calan bosch menorca viagra online paypal payment no prescription viagra tablets price in pakistan urdu jang ubretid 5 mg wirkstoff voltaren clomipramine hcl 25 mg capsule diltiazem 120 mg credit irbesartan 150 mg preisner bad experience with zoloft reviews aminofilina ampolla nombre generico de zantac propecia pain in breast where to get desi viagra in delhi cialis 20 mg hakkinda quetiapine cochrane reviews cost of lisinopril per month denosyl compresse 90 mg nifedipine diflucan 200 mg posologie de lamoxicilline zopiclone 7 5 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac diclofenac otc usa k swiss tubes womens reviews on viagra norfloxacin uti prophylaxis in women bayer aspirin 325 mg side effects tadalis sx 20 mg tabletten zum luvox for depression reviews on garcinia rizatriptan generico precio is liquid tamox nolvadex best site to buy viagra from erythromycin in gi trattoria forestali usati valtrex citalopram online no prescription uk prednisone pred 10 corticosteroid medications lithium springs shelby nc real estate accutane name brand card beipackzettel clarithromycin 250 mg para que es la losartan 50 mg escitalopram usan meloxicam normon 15 mg comprimidos efg grados de nulidad de los actos procesales viagra medicine rate in pakistan prednisone 50 mg for asthma susalud nitroglycerin betamethasone valerate cream name brand cialis samples online where do buy 100mg doxycycline allegra cohen real height prednisone pain in chest bactrim forte 800 160 mg tablet fiyati calamine lotion inactive ingredients in benadryl progesterone cyproterone acetate for sale teva gabapentin 300 mg used folic acid supplementation in methotrexate viagra online australia customs alcohol montelukast 10 mg shelf life ramipril best price lb agar ingredients in benadryl verapamil 40 mg uputstvo za minocycline autoimmune disorder effect of ph in linezolid injection caverta sildenafil citrate tablets 100 mg india cefuroxime sodium generic how often to take benadryl 25 mg viagra in german ranitidine brand generic keflex medsafe cetirizine dihydrochloride tablets 10 mg minocycline cost in india what can you substitute for lisinopril 5 mg donde comprar cialis argentina fluoxetine withdrawal uk medicamento ramipril 10 mg mycoprotein ingredients in benadryl compra venta cytotec costa rica doxylamine pyridoxine australia map pioglitazone metformin generic or brand para que sirve el zantac de 150 mg montelukast chewable tablet price buy ciprodex boniva generic substitute for bystolic protonix generic vs prilosec buspar insomnia goes away in the end johnny elavil best time take safe use voltaren pregnant ciprofloxacino 500 mg comprimidos aricept discovery safe maximum dose of amoxicillin head and shoulders inactive ingredients in synthroid is viagra otc in the uk how to taper off of escitalopram 10 mg naproxen 500 mg for kidney stones aspirin 100 mg table te altex where to buy alli weight loss pills buying kamagra thailand chiang mai 2 diltiazem in petrolatum definition is it safe to combine cialis with caverject himalaya evecare online augmentin price malaysia viagra substitute over the counter australia time when is the best time of day to take lasix azithromycin over the counter ph ivermectin rowcmoadreders australia 25 mg trazodone pregnant dog clomid for cheap lanoxin in infants sumatriptan 1a pharma 50 mg ketonal 50 mg ulotka dawkowanie augmentin pakistan vs new zealand ist test day 3 estradiol escitalopram price ireland pravachol for sale omep akut 20 mg nebenwirkungen viagra does viagra for women really work cost of levaquin generic flomax antinfiammatorio costochondral junction haldol 5 mg tabs for bass accutane safe take acne amoxicillin tqeovertoz discount how was lovastatin discovered piroxicam 20 mg cap zovirax 200 mg comprimidos masticables irbesartan hctz 300 12 5 mg tb images lexapro cost at cub priligy reviews ukulele purchase valtrex rowcmoadreders anastan mefenamic acid 500 mg obat apa generic viagra 100mg reviews on washers protonix 40 mg tbec lcs depakote 500 mg twice a day pill comprar finpecia en espa?a claritin low price aspegic ingredients in benadryl ciriax ciprofloxacino 500 mg macrobid in pyelonephritis best chapstick when on accutane dulcolax safety during pregnancy buy cephalexin capsules for cats tegretol cr 200 mg 20 tablet amitriptyline 30 mg weight gain cialis generica en costa rica high dose bicalutamide monotherapy in hypertensive losartan 100mg price cialis costco prices lansoprazole biogaran 30 mg aricept cost australia buy caverta by ranbaxy online cost of levetiracetam nystatin and triamcinolone acetonide cream usp generic kalzinol ingredients in benadryl vardenafil 20 mg buy zoloft 300 mg dopamine receptors biaxin 500 mg reviews what is trental 400 mg para que sirve escitalopram de 10 mg etodolac 600 mg uses is synthroid generic safe venlafaxine generic teva hosboral 500 mg metformin naproxen anti inflammatory uk lamisil tablets price in india zaxis 210 for sale in uk zithromax ic carvedilol 3 125 mg nys real estate license reciprocal states loratadine generic zyprexa reviews revolution health feldene gel to buy fluconazole capsules 150 mg precio del dilantin kapseals vs capsules for sale hydrous ointment bp ingredients in benadryl how fast does mirtazapine work in dogs para que se usa el flagyl acetaminophen vs ibuprofen safety for dogs how to tell if finasteride is real flurazepam other drugs in same class as amlodipine generic cialis paypal losartan 50 mg gpo price for crestor 10mg is motrin 800 mg addictive use of tamsulosin in kidney stones finasteride manufacturers in hyderabad bupropion hcl xl weight loss reviews cimlok 400 mg seroquel ephedrine caffeine aspirin ukiah phenergan pill identifier generic subutex legal buy viagra price cytotec philippines is it safe to take cipro and benadryl zegerid otc inactive ingredients in aleve ureaplasma treatment uk azithromycin viagra price in chennai stores over the counter viagra in the usa aprepitant generico de cialis plavix vs generic what will generic abilify cost viagra in the elderly precio viagra 100 mg en farmacia espa?a ranbaxy atorvastatin 40 mg opsumit generic plavix tamoxifen 20 mg pctc benadryl much safe clotrimazole 100 mg ovulos anticonceptivos zithromax liquid flavors sildenafil online kaufen deutschland viagra from supermarket pastilla cytotec como usarlas clomipramine hydrochloride in pregnancy ceftin safe take while pregnant warfarin 5 mg nomogram bilirubin macrobid 100 mg spc valtrex generico de cialis price for ketoconazole shampoo drug terazosin side effects in men augmentin price mercury buying avodart uk clomid 150 mg triplets uterine lining too thin clomid reviews can you drink alcohol cefuroxime axetil 500 mg 6 mercaptopurine price all generic viagra use of claritin in pregnancy floxing research written by ian d tonks in neoplasia pp gabapentin 300 mg for dogs openindiana 151a8 isotretinoin norwalk 500 mg amoxicillin dosage filme celebrex online gratis pariet generico prezzo kenya does claritin 10 mg make you drowsy tadalafil 2.5mg price amoxicillin rash in babies tamsulosin 0 4 mg basics janesville generic seroquel cost wellbutrin in combination with lexapro dosage for doxycycline hyclate 100 mg abilify 10 mg bipolar bactrim side effects in infants meclizine uk boots brands ibuprofen 600 mg dosage instructions lipitor 80 mg philippine peso price irwin naturals hoodia action reviews on windows viagra generico rio de janeiro 6000 mg of zoloft
WIRETAP LAWS AND PROCEDURES
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE  U.S. GOVERNMENT TAPS A LINE


Donald P. Delaney, 
Senior Investigator New York State Police

Dorothy E. Denning, 
Professor and Chair Computer Science Department, Georgetown University

John Kaye, County Prosecutor Monmouth County, New Jersey

Alan R. McDonald, 
Special Assistant to the Assistant Director Technical Services Division, FBI

1. Introduction

Although wiretaps are generally illegal in the United States, the
federal government and the governments of thirty seven states have been
authorized through federal and state legislation to intercept wire and
electronic communications under certain stringent rules which include
obtaining a court order. These rules have been designed to ensure the
protection of individual privacy and Fourth Amendment rights, while
permitting the use of wiretaps for investigations of serious criminal
activity and for foreign intelligence.

This article describes the legal requirements for government
interceptions of wire and electronic communications and some of the
additional procedures and practices followed by federal and state
agencies. The legal requirements are rooted in two pieces of federal
legislation: the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III
of the Act (hereafter "Title III")), passed in 1968, and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed in 1978. Title III
established the basic law for federal and state law enforcement
interceptions performed for the purpose of criminal investigations,
while FISA established the law for federal-level interceptions performed
for intelligence and counterintelligence operations. We will first
describe Title III interceptions and then describe FISA interceptions.

 2. Title III Interceptions

Title III, as amended (particularly by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986), is codified at Title 18 USC, Sections 2510-2521.
These statutes provide privacy protection for and govern the
interception of oral, wire, and electronic communications. Title III
covers all telephone communications regardless of the medium, except
that it does not cover the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the handset and base unit. The
law authorizes the interception of oral, wire, and electronic
communications by investigative and law enforcement officers conducting
criminal investigations pertaining to serious criminal offenses, i.e.,
felonies, following the issuance of a court order by a judge. The Title
III law authorizes the interception of particular criminal
communications related to particular criminal offenses. In short, it
authorizes the acquisition of evidence of crime. It does not authorize
noncriminal intelligence gathering, nor does it authorize interceptions
related to social or political views.

Thirty seven states have statutes permitting interceptions by state and
local law enforcement officers for certain types of criminal
investigations. All of the state statutes are based upon Title III from
which they are derivative. These statutes must be at least as
restrictive as Title III, and in fact most are more restrictive in their
requirements. In describing the legal requirements, we will focus on
those of Title III since they define the baseline for all wiretaps
performed by federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

In recent years, state statutes have been modified to keep pace with
rapid technological advances in telecommunications. For example, New
Jersey amended its electronic surveillance statute in 1993 to include
cellular telephones, cordless telephones, digital display beepers, fax
transmissions, computer-to-computer communications, and traces obtained
through "caller-ID".

Wiretaps are limited to the crimes specified in Title III and state
statutes. In New Jersey, the list includes murder, kidnapping, gambling,
robbery, bribery, aggravated assault, wrongful credit practices,
terrorist threats, arson, burglary, felony thefts, escape, forgery,
narcotics trafficking, firearms trafficking, racketeering, and organized
crime.

Most wiretaps are large undertakings, requiring a substantial use of
resources. In 1992, the average cost of installing intercept devices and
monitoring communications was $46,492. Despite budget constraints and
personnel shortages, law enforcement conducts wiretaps as necessary, but
obviously, because of staffing and costs, judiciously.

2.1 Application for a Court Order

All government wiretaps require a court order based upon a detailed
showing of probable cause. To obtain a court order, a three-step process
is involved. First, the law enforcement officer responsible for the
investigation must draw up a detailed affidavit showing that there is
probable cause to believe that the target telephone is being used to
facilitate a specific, serious, indictable crime.

Second, an attorney for the federal, state, or local government must
work with the law enforcement officer to prepare an application for a
court order, based upon the officer's affidavit. At the federal level,
the application must be approved by the Attorney General, Deputy
Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, any Assistant Attorney
General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant
Attorney General in the Criminal Division designated by the Attorney
General. At the state and local level, the application must be made and
approved by the principal prosecuting attorney of the state (State
Attorney General) or political subdivision thereof (District Attorney or
County Prosecutor). The attorney must be authorized by a statute of that
state to make such applications.

Third, the attorney must present the approved application ex parte
(without an adversary hearing) to a federal or state judge who is
authorized to issue a court order for electronic surveillance. A state
or local police officer or federal law enforcement agent cannot make an
application for a court order directly to a judge.

Typically, a court order is requested after a lengthy investigation and
the use of a "Dialed Number Recorder" (DNR). The DNR is used to track
the outgoing calls from the suspect's phone in order to demonstrate that
the suspect is communicating with known criminals.

Title III requires that an application for a court order specify:

(a) the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application
and the high-level government attorney authorizing the application;

(b) the facts and circumstances of the case justifying the application,
including details of the particular offense under investigation, the
identity of the person committing it, the type of communications sought,
and the nature and location of the communication facilities;

(c) whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and
failed or why they would likely fail or be too dangerous;

(d) the period of time for the interception (at most 30 days -
extensions may be permitted upon reapplication);

(e) the facts concerning all previous applications involving any of the
same persons or facilities;

(f) where the application is for the extension of an order, the results
thus far obtained from the interception.

The process of making an application for a court order is further
restricted by internal procedures adopted by law enforcement agencies to
ensure that wiretaps conform to the laws and are used only when
justified. The following describes the process for the FBI and the New
York State Police.

2.1.1 FBI Applications

In order for an FBI agent to conduct an interception, the agent must
follow procedures that go well beyond the legal requirements imposed by
Title III and which involve extensive internal review. In preparing the
affidavit, the FBI agent in the field works with the field office
principal legal advisor and also with an attorney in the local U.S.
Attorney's Office, revising the documentation to take into account their
comments and suggestions. After the documents are approved by field
office management, they are submitted to the Department of Justice's
Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) in the Criminal Division and to
the FBI Headquarters (HQ). At FBI HQ, the documents go to the Legal
Counsel Division (LCD) and the Criminal Investigative Division (CID).
Within the CID, they are sent to the program manager of the criminal
program unit relating to the type of violation under investigation,
e.g., organized crime. The program manager determines whether the
subjects of the proposed interception are worthy targets of
investigation and whether the interception is worth doing. Attorneys in
the FBI's LCD and the DOJ's OEO further refine the documents.

After the documents are approved by the DOJ's OEO and by FBI HQ, they
are referred to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or above), who
reviews the documents and signs off on them. At this point, the DOJ
authorizes the local U.S. Attorney's Office to file the final version of
the documents (application, affidavit, court order, and service provider
order) in court. The U.S. Attorney's Office then submits the documents
and the DOJ authorization to a federal judge. The entire process can
take as long as a month.

The following summarizes the people and organizations involved in the
preparation or approval of the application and the issuance of a court
order:

1. FBI agent
2. FBI field office attorney (principal legal advisor)
3. FBI field office management
4. Attorney in local U.S. Attorney's office
5. DOJ Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO)
6. FBI HQ Legal Counsel Division (LCD)
7. FBI HQ Criminal Investigative Division (CID)
8. DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or higher)
9. Federal District Court judge


 2.1.2 New York State Police Applications

Within the New York State Police, electronic surveillance is conducted
by Senior Investigators in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
In preparing an affidavit, the investigator works with the District
Attorney's Office (or, in the case of a federal investigation, the U.S.
Attorney's office) and with the BCI Captain of the investigator's troop.
(Wiretap applications can be made and approved by the State Attorney
General, but this is unusual.) The Captain assesses whether review by
Division Headquarters is necessary and confers with the Assistant Deputy
Superintendent (ADS) or Headquarters Captain for final determination. If
Headquarters review is deemed necessary, then all documentation is sent
to the ADS along with a memorandum, endorsed by the Troop Unit
Supervisor and the Troop or Detail Commander, requesting approval. If
Headquarters review is deemed unnecessary, then the memo is sent without
the documentation. Once the ADS and District Attorney (DA) approve the
application, the DA submits the application to a judge who grants or
denies the court order.

2.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Not all judges have the authority to grant court orders for wiretaps. In
New Jersey, for example, only eight judges are designated as "wiretap
judges" for the entire state. These judges are given special training to
be sensitive to personal rights of privacy and to recognize the
importance of telephone intercepts for law enforcement.

Before a judge can approve an application for electronic surveillance
and issue a court order, the judge must determine that:

(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing,
has committed, or is about to commit an offense covered by the law;

(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications
concerning that offense will be obtained through such interception;

(c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or
reasonably appear unlikely to succeed or to be too dangerous;

(d) there is probable cause for belief that the facilities from which,
or the place where the communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
such person.

In addition to showing probable cause, one of the main criterion for
determining whether a court order should be issued is whether normal
investigative techniques have been or are likely to be unsuccessful
(criterion (c) above). Electronic surveillance is a tool of last resort
and cannot be used if other methods of investigation could reasonably be
used instead. Such normal investigative methods usually include visual
surveillance, interviewing subjects, the use of informers, telephone
record analysis, and DNRs. However, these techniques often have limited
impact on an investigation. Continuous surveillance by police can create
suspicion and therefore be hazardous; further, it cannot disclose the
contents of telephone conversations. Questioning identified suspects or
executing search warrants at their residence can substantially
jeopardize an investigation before the full scope of the operation is
revealed, and information can be lost through interpretation. Informants
are useful and sought out by police, but the information they provide
does not always reveal all of the players or the extent of an operation,
and great care must be taken to ensure that the informants are
protected. Moreover, because informants are often criminals themselves,
they may not be believed in court. Telephone record analysis and DNRs
are helpful, but do not reveal the contents of conversations or the
identities of parties. Other methods of investigation that may be tried
include undercover operations and stings. But while effective in some
cases, undercover operations are difficult and dangerous, and stings do
not always work.

If the judge approves the application, then a court order is issued
specifying the relevant information given in the application, namely,
the identity of the person (if known) whose communications are to be
intercepted, the nature and location of the communication facilities,
the type of communication to be intercepted and the offense to which it
relates, the agency authorized to perform the interception and the
person authorizing the application, and the period of time during which
such interception is authorized. A court order may also require that
interim status reports be made to the issuing judge while the wiretap is
in progress.

2.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation where there is immediate danger of death or
serious physical injury to any person, or conspiratorial activities
threatening national security or characteristic of organized crime,
Title III permits any investigative or law enforcement officer specially
designated by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the
Associate Attorney General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of
any state or subdivision thereof, to intercept communications provided
an application for a court order is made within 48 hours. In the event a
court order is not issued, the contents of any intercepted communication
is treated as having been obtained in violation of Title III.

In New York State, even an emergency situation requires a court order
from a judge. However, the judge may grant a temporary court order based
on an oral application from the District Attorney. The oral
communication must be recorded and transcribed, and must be followed by
a written application within 24 hours. The duration of a temporary
warrant cannot exceed 24 hours and cannot be renewed except through a
written application.

2.4 Execution of a Court Order

2.4.1 Installation of a Wiretap

To execute a court order for a wiretap, the investigative or law
enforcement officer takes the court order or emergency provision to the
communications service provider. Normally, the service provider is the
local exchange carrier. When served with a court order, the service
provider (or landlord, custodian, or other person named) is mandated
under Title III to assist in the execution of the interception by
providing all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance. The service provider is compensated for reasonable expenses
incurred. In light of rapid technological developments including
cellular telephones and integrated computer networks, the New Jersey
statute also requires the service provider to give technical assistance
and equipment to fulfill the court order. This requirement has not yet
been tested in court.

Normally, the government leases a line from the service provider and the
intercepted communications are transmitted to a remote government
monitoring facility over that line. In many cases, the bridging
connection is made within the service provider's central office
facility. Alternatively, a law enforcement agency may request the
service provider to give the "pairs and appearances" (a place to connect
to the suspect's line) in the "local loop" for the suspect's phone. A
law enforcement technician then makes the connection.

When a suspect's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the
person is attempting to evade or thwart interception), then a "roving"
wiretap, which suspends the specification of the telephone, may be used.
In this case, prior to intercepting communications, the officer must use
some other method of surveillance in order to determine the exact
location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. Once
determined, the location or telephone number is given to the service
provider for coordination and prompt assistance. The officer may not
intercept communications randomly in order to track a person (random or
mass surveillance is not permitted under any circumstances).

2.4.2 Minimization

Once any electronic surveillance begins, the law enforcement officer
must "minimize" -- that is, attempt to limit the interception of
communications to the specified offenses in the court order. Prior to
the surveillance, a federal or state attorney holds a "minimization
meeting" with the investigators who will be participating in the case to
ensure that the rules are followed.

Minimization is normally accomplished by turning off the intercept and
then performing a spot check every few minutes to determine if the
conversation has turned to the subject of the court order. This avoids
picking up family gossip. Special problems may arise where criminals
communicate in codes that are designed to conceal criminal activity in
what sounds like mundane household discussion. If an intercepted
communication is in a code or foreign language, and if someone is not
reasonably available to interpret the code or foreign language, then the
conversation can be recorded and minimization deferred until an expert
in that code or language is available to interpret the communication.
Should a wiretap fail to meet the minimization parameters, all of the
evidence obtained from the wiretap could be inadmissible.

2.4.3 Recording

All intercepted communications are to be recorded when possible. As a
practical mater, law enforcement officers make working copies of the
original tapes. In many instances at the state and local level, the
originals are delivered to the prosecutor's office and maintained in the
prosecutor's custody. The copies are screened by the case officer for
pertinent conversations (e.g., "I'll deliver the dope at 8:00 pm."). A
compilation of the relevant conversations, together with the
corroboratory surveillances often provides the probable cause for search
warrants and/or arrest warrants.

2.4.4 Termination of Electronic Surveillance

Electronic surveillance must terminate upon attainment of the
objectives, or in any event within 30 days. To continue an interception
beyond 30 days, the officer, through a government attorney, must apply
for and be granted an extension based upon a new application and court
order.

When the period of a court order, or extension thereof, expires, the
original tapes must be made available to the issuing judge and sealed
under court supervision. The tapes must be maintained in such fashion
for 10 years.

2.5 Notification and Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Upon termination of an interception, the judge who issued the court
order must notify the persons named in the order that the interception
took place. Normally, this must be done within 90 days, but it may be
postponed upon showing of good cause. If the judge determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to make portions of the intercepted
communications available to the subjects, the judge may do so.

The contents of the communications may not be used as evidence in any
trial or hearing unless each party has received a copy of the
application and court order at least 10 days in advance of the trial,
and has been given the opportunity to move to suppress the evidence. A
motion to suppress the evidence may be made on the grounds that it was
not obtained in complete conformance with the laws.

2.6 Reports

Within 30 days after the expiration or denial of a court order, Title
III requires that the judge provide information about the order to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO). Each year the
Attorney General (or a designated Assistant Attorney General) must
report, on behalf of the federal government, to the AO a summary of all
orders and interceptions for the year; reports for state and local
jurisdictions are made by the principal prosecuting attorney of the
jurisdiction. The AO then integrates these summaries into an annual
report: "Report on Applications for Orders Authorizing or Approving the
Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications (Wiretap
Report)" covering all federal and state electronic surveillance,
including wiretaps. The 1992 report is about 200 pages and includes
information about each interception authorized in 1992, update
information for interceptions authorized in 1982-1991, and summary
statistics. The summary statistics include the following data (numbers
in parenthesis are the 1992 figures):

(1) number of interceptions authorized (919), denied (0), and installed
(846)

(2) average duration (in days) of original authorization (28) and
extensions (30)

(3) the place/facility where authorized (303 single family dwelling, 135
apartment, 3 multi-dwelling, 119 business, 4 roving, 66 combination, 289
other)

(4) major offenses involved (634 narcotics, 90 racketeering, 66
gambling, 35 homicide/ assault, 16 larceny/theft, 9 kidnapping, 8
bribery, 7 loansharking/usury/extortion, 54 other)

(5) average number of (a) persons intercepted (117), (b) interceptions
(1,861), and (c) incriminating intercepts (347) per order where
interception devices were installed

(6) average cost of interception ($46,492)

(7) type of surveillance used for the 846 interceptions installed (632
telephone, 38 microphone, 113 electronic, 63 combination)

(8) number of persons arrested (2,685) and convicted (607) as the result
of 1992 intercepts

(9) activity taking place during 1992 as the result of intercepts
terminated in years 1982-1991, including number of arrests (1211),
trials (280), motions to suppress that are granted (14), denied (141),
and pending (37), and convictions (1450) (there is a lag between
interceptions, arrests, and convictions, with many arrests and most
convictions associated with a wiretap that terminated in one year taking
place in subsequent years)

Most of the above data is broken down by jurisdiction. Of the 919
authorized intercepts, 340 (37%) were federal. New York State had 197,
New Jersey 111, Florida 80, and Pennsylvania 77. The remaining 114
intercepts were divided among 18 states, none of which had more than 17
intercepts. During the past decade, the average number of authorized
intercepts per year has been about 780.

Individual law enforcement agencies also require internal reports. For
example, the New York Sate Police requires that each week, the Troop or
Detail Captain prepare a report summarizing the status of all
eavesdropping activity within the unit, including the productivity and
plans for each electronic surveillance installation and a brief synopsis
of pertinent activity. This is sent to the New York State Police
Division Headquarters Captain who prepares a report summarizing the
status of all eavesdropping installations.

One of the reasons for the significant amount of post wiretap reporting
is to provide a substantial record for legislatures when considering
whether or not to reenact or modify wiretap statutes.

 3. FISA Interceptions

Title 50 USC, Sections 1801-1811, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) of 1978, covers electronic surveillance for foreign
intelligence purposes (including counterintelligence and
counterterrorism). It governs wire and electronic communications sent by
or intended to be received by United States persons (citizens, aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, corporations, and
associations of U.S. persons) who are in the U.S. when there is a
reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for
law enforcement purposes; nonconsensual wire intercepts that are
implemented within the U.S.; and radio intercepts when the sender and
all receivers are in the U.S. and a warrant would be required for law
enforcement purposes. It does not cover intercepts of U.S. persons who
are overseas (unless the communications are with a U.S. person who is
inside the U.S.). Electronic surveillance conducted under FISA is
classified.

FISA authorizes electronic surveillance of foreign powers and agents of
foreign powers for foreign intelligence purposes. Normally, a court
order is required to implement a wiretap under FISA. There are, however,
two exceptions. The first is when the communications are exclusively
between or among foreign powers or involve technical intelligence other
than spoken communications from a location under the open and exclusive
control of a foreign power; there is no substantial risk that the
surveillance will acquire the communications to or from a U.S.person;
and proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth by
the law. Under those conditions, authorization can be granted by the
President through the Attorney General for a period up to one year. The
second is following a declaration of war by Congress. Then the
President, though the Attorney General, can authorize electronic
surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes without a court order for
up to 15 days.

Orders for wiretaps are granted by a special court established by FISA.
The court consists of seven district court judges appointed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. Judges serve seven-year terms.

3.1 Application for a Court Order

Applications for a court order are made by Federal officers and require
approval by the Attorney General. Each application must include:

(1) the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the Attorney General's approval;

(3) the target of the electronic surveillance;

(4) justification that the target is a foreign power or agent of a
foreign power (except no U.S person can be considered a foreign power or
agent thereof solely based on activities protected by the First
Amendment) and that the facilities or places where the surveillance is
be directed will be used by the same;

(5) the proposed minimization procedures, which must meet certain
requirements to protect the privacy of U.S. persons;

(6) the nature of the information sought and type of communications
subjected to surveillance;

(7) certification(s) by the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs or other high-level official in the area of national
security or defense (Presidential appointee subject to Senate
confirmation) that the information sought is foreign intelligence
information and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by
normal investigative methods;

(8) the means by which the surveillance will be effected;

(9) the facts concerning all previous applications involving the same
persons, facilities, or places;

(10) the period of time for the interception (maximum 90 days or, when
the target is a foreign power, one year);

(11) coverage of all surveillance devices to be employed and the
minimization procedures applying to each.

Some of the above information can be omitted when the target is a
foreign power.

Within the FBI, the process of applying for a court order under FISA is
as exacting and subject to review as under Title III. The main
differences are that under FISA, the FBI Intelligence Division is
involved rather than the Criminal Investigative Division, the DOJ Office
of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR) is involved rather than either
the U.S. Attorney's Office or the DOJ Criminal Division, and the
application is approved by the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney
General) rather than by a lower DOJ official.

3.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Before a judge can approve an application, the judge must determine that
the authorizations are valid; that there is probable cause to believe
that the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or
agent of a foreign power and that the facilities or places where the
surveillance is be directed will be used by the same; and that the
proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth in the
law. If the judge approves the application, an order is issued
specifying the relevant information from the application and directing
the communication carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified
person to furnish all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance and to properly maintain under security procedures any
records relating to the surveillance.

3.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation, the Attorney General or designee can
authorize the use of electronic surveillance provided the judge is
notified at the time and an application is made to the judge within 24
hours. If such application is not obtained, then the judge notifies any
U.S. persons named in the application or subject to the surveillance,
though such notification can be postponed or forgone upon showing of
good cause.

3.4 Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Like Title III, FISA places strict controls on what information can be
acquired through electronic surveillance and how such information can be
used. No information can be disclosed for law enforcement purposes
except with the proviso that it may only be used in a criminal
proceedings under advance authorization from the Attorney General. If
the government intends to use such information in court, then the
aggrieved person must be notified in advance. The person may move to
suppress the evidence.

3.5 Reports

Each year, the Attorney General must give the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts (AO) a report of the number of FISA
applications and the number of orders and extensions granted, modified,
or denied. In 1992, there were 484 orders. Since 1979, there has been an
average of a little over 500 FISA orders per year.

Because intercepts conducted under FISA are classified, detailed
information analogous to that required under Title III is not reported
to the AO, nor made available to the public. However, records of
Attorney General certifications, applications, and orders granted must
be held for at least 10 years, and the Attorney General must inform two
Congressional oversight committees of all surveillance activity on a
semiannual basis. These committees are the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence.


Advanced TSCM Signals Detection and Analysis
TSCM - Sweeping the Spectrum for Eavesdropping Devices

Any comments or questions regarding this specific page?

Please feel free to sign our Guest Book

Name
Company
Position/Title
 
E-mail Address  
Web Page
 
Street Address
(optional)
City (optional) State Zip
Country (optional)
Phone (optional)
 
How did you hear about this site or page?
Do you need to have a bug sweep or other TSCM service performed?
Do you need any TSCM equipment?
 
Comments



| Home | What is TSCM | Types of Bugs | Warning Signs You're Bugged |
| How To Behave if Bugged | TSCM Threat Levels | How To Engage a TSCM Firm |
| Qualifications | TSCM Protocol | Bug Frequencies | Phone Taps and Bugging |
| Signal Analysis | TDR Analysis | TDR Tutorial | Wiretapping | Training | Tools |
| Equipment | OSC-5000 | Kaiser | Riser Bond | Avcom | Search Rcvrs |
| Outside Links | Recommended TSCM Books | TSCM Reference Library |
| Recommended U.S. TSCM Firms | TSCM-L Mailing List |


-----------------------

    To be contacted for a confidential consultation
    please E-mail: jmatk@tscm.com

    or send a letter via US Mail to:
    James M. Atkinson
    Granite Island Group
    127 Eastern Avenue #291
    Gloucester, MA 01931-8008

    or call:
    Telephone: (978) 546-3803 / Fax: (978) 546-9467

    URL: http://www.tscm.com/

Copyright ©2002, Granite Island Group