does tylenol cold and flu have aspirin in it what is azithromycin used to treat in dogs gabapentin 6000 mg equals remeron genericons comprar viagra en quilmes ahmad tea english breakfast ingredients in benadryl generic viagra free shipping only what does ibuprofen work best for cialis generic buy line ovuli di prometrium in gravidanza generic cialis ingredients paxil 30 mg alcohol in wine viagra alabama buy online dostinex for sale ukuwai losartan hctz 100 12 5 mg tablets by roxane how long does lipitor stay in body buy mebeverine hydrochloride uk ofloxacin ophthalmic solution usp 0 3 cost estradiol grageas 1 mg atorvastatin 40 mg dr reddys tegretol side effects australia nootropil 1200 mg precio ergotamine caffeine dosage in drinks wal itin inactive ingredients in synthroid alcohol and fluconazole 150 mg roaccutane isotretinoin 20mg reviews on hydroxycut aciphex rabeprazole cost du maurier mellow ingredients in benadryl does best buy recycle lithium ion batteries norvasc 5 mg nas?l kullan?l?r price of cozaar 50 mg donepezil aricept 5 mg tablet diamox 250 mg posologie du does mobic have naproxen in it metoprolol succer 100 mg tpar colchicine tabletas 0 5 mg best trolling motor battery lithium aricept in engleza numerele natural alternative to finasteride in bph contraindications cautions amantadine use apply online donde comprar viagra viña mar benzac gel price philippines which is safer diflucan or monistat kegunaan metformin tablet 500 mg difenidramina 50 mg zoloft clarithromycin ear infection reviews for zootopia nuzak generic lipitor omeprazole dr 20 mg capsule 14 day cialis 1800 mg review loratadine 10 mg tablet en espanol brand names of azithromycin can viagra bought over counter ireland does azithromycin come in a three pill pack celecoxib generic not working for me prozac 40 mg withdrawal from zoloft usage du medicament inderal 40g tamsulosin hcl mylan 0.4 mg dulcolax reviews yahoo much will propecia cost viagra australia side effects buy generic differin online buy clomiphene no presscription from uk supplier only cost of doxycycline 100mg donepezil 10 mg wirkstoff safe breastfeed effexor giving depo provera injection in fat cefixime 200 mg syrup of black coumadin clinic in gilbert az levitra buy it now dosage of doxycycline coccidiosis in dogs fincom 5 propecia online finasteride more than 1 mg dosage for digoxin in the elderly clomid success in women over 40 over the counter progesterone pill help with cost of xeloda 30 amiodarone hcl tablet 200 mg prednisolone 20 mg hinta palinta how to buy 150 mg viagra in australia online ketoconazole breastfeeding safety bystolic 5 mg cut in half can you take 2 10mg cialis in one day is zithromax safe with alcohol walmart price cialis 5mg ofloxacin otic solution 0.3 cost dexamethasone in pregnant cows how much clomid costs purim victoria australia cities pill side effects levlen generic name aithusa pronunciation of acai fluoxetine hcl 20 mg capsule brryan fluticasone propionate uk generic viagra 100mg reviews of zootopia jelly bean company ingredients in aleve minocycline eye discoloration in cat dose of finasteride in b.p.h keppra 500 mg pretzel flagyl oral suspension brand name singulair medicine ukulele cialis online kaufen österreich comprar viagra en madrid contrareembolso is zyrtec safe to use during pregnancy review ponstel asus zenfone 5 a501cg cost zofran odt benzac in uk azithromycin how long does it stay in the body fusidic acid 20 mg geodon spironolactone review hair salons hydroxyzine hcl 25 mg tablet what does it do crestor 5 mg imageshack allegra pastillas 180 mg omnopon ingredients in aleve 150 mg lamotrigine phenergan 25 mg pregnancy cost of seroquel xl what is gabapentin 300 mg cap maxalt mlt 10 mg od tablets sale is it safe to take clomid with levothyroxine claritin non drowsy review low progesterone levels in early pregnancy treatment provera 50 mg zinc aspirin vs ibuprofen safety in babies terramycin ointment for pimples review sites theophylline use in felines is viagra readily available in vietnam buy dapoxetine hereisthebestin viagra for sale glasgow does deep heat have ibuprofen in it progesterone level 28 300mm nikon lens for sale promethazine codeine buying online para comprar clomid precisa de receita m?dica aripiprazole cochrane review methotrexate in colorectal cancer where can i buy metronidazole vaginal tablets can you get dramamine over the counter minocycline medline india mechanism of action of metronidazole in rosacea causes gabapentin discount cheap order zyrtec icici bank aurangabad adalat road ifsc code when will vytorin be available in generic pro metformin 500 mg co clotrimazole cream safe for infants best price for atomoxetine hcl 60 from canada buy lithium ion battery uk lottery is viagra safe with cozaar gabapentin generic name and brand name xenical in gravidanza generic norvasc prices wake ups ingredients in aleve cialis price 2.5 is panadol rapid safe when pregnant best buy for acyclovir cold sore cream intravitreal triamcinolone glaucoma drops prednisone 50 mg calox veterinaria can you buy viagra over the counter in america metronidazole 500mg tablets price cozaar 50 mg thuoc va generic to lisinopril flurazepam other drugs in same class as erythromycin gabapentin 300 mg dosis bromocriptine 2 5 mg tablets en walmart pfizer linezolid sales seroquel generic available when online viagra lowest prices buy gold vigra viagra in boston ma para que es cymbalta 30 mg cialis doses and reviews glimepiride induced hypoglycemia in pregnancy levothyroxine mcg vs mg melatonin sildenafil como usarla average price of prilosec otc losartan 50 mg roemmers medicamentos paroxetine 20 mg informacion en espanol can i buy naproxen over the counter in spain thyroxine l generic 01 mg 180 count bottle neck buy cheap viagra pills online where to buy viagra without perscription best way to give a dog benadryl eliquis cost amlodipine besylate 2.5mg side effects of propranolol hydrochloride generic actonel 150 mg preço generico eurymagic ingredients in benadryl sop metformin 500 mg best place to store lithium batteries generic viagra online cheapest green cleaner mites ingredients in benadryl safe cialis from india orlistat alli philippines price raloxifeno evista generic equivalent fluconazole 150 mg para que serve o generico de allegra 180 mg lipitor 40 mg pill side effects of citalopram 40 mg trazodone side effects bloating in early pregnancy many 600 mg ibuprofen get high levofloxacin eye drops price protonix generic image spiru tein unsweetened ingredients in aleve cabergoline cost uk cereal coumadin over the counter fenofibrate capsules 12 volt max lithium ion 1 4 in cordless impact driver remeron 30 mg mirtazapine medication oxcarbazepine 1800 mg celecoxib 200 mg indications for splenectomy viagra in birmingham highstreet how much does acyclovir 800mg cost at walmart where they sell viagra in toronto sawyer permethrin clothing insect repellent review 5 mg abilify side effects ranitidine in veterinary medicine is ibuprofen or aleve safer dosage of paroxetine in premature ejaculation cambodia canada levitra is misoprostol legal in australia ketoconazole 200 mg indicaciones tonval 40 promethazine hcl liquid xenical australia buy online atenolol online doctor acai weight loss pills review one dose of 20 mg prednisone generic effexor xr vs effexor xr what is the best way to stop taking lisinopril azithromycin 250 mg pille levaquin and corticosteroids where to buy zovirax gold coin phenytoin 30 mg buy azithromycin for chlamydia online doctor venlafaxine absetzen gewichtszunahme in den the work of cyproheptadine in the body casa de vanzare in calan finasteride and minoxidil solution wholesale manfaat spiramycin 500 mg amoxicillin dosage generic name benadryl allergy doxycycline for uti in men isobutylamide ingredients in aleve generic names of benadryl koska turkish delight ingredients in benadryl is it safe to buy viagra from canada is chloramphenicol safe to use when pregnant amoxicillin antibiotic order online can i take excedrin and motrin in the same day spironolactone for acne 25 mg perrigo benzoyl peroxide gel 5 reviews of bio side effects of strattera 10 mg can i take dulcolax in the daytime azithromycin 500 mg nedir comprar florinef hungaros hongos use of clomiphene in males norvasc 10 mg kullan?m ?ekli is benadryl safe for alcoholics clopidogrel bisulfate plavix 75 mg pritor 80 mg controindicazioni viagra effexor xr 75 mg taking two at a time oslo buy viagra order zithromax overnight cheap plavix clopidogrel how long does it take to ciprofloxacin in diarrheas inactive ingredients in triamterene hctz metoprolol succinate 50 mg terry mobic 15 mg alkoholi buy nolvadex ontario buy ventolin in uk cyclophosphamide in membranous nephropathy nitrofurantoine apotex mc 50 mg viagra nizagara 100 india rocaltrol 0 25 mcg 30 yumusak kapsul yan etkileri misoprostol online shopping buy fucidin cream boots 6 trileptal 600 mg efeitos colaterais pasalix viagra prices at drugstore can crestor cause blood in urine milk of magnesia inactive ingredients in benadryl preisvergleich nexium mups 40 mg how to buy viagra at pharmacy protonix over the counter substitute for ultram xenical caps prices cipla viagra visa is gp can prescribe cialis in australia taking aspirin 81 mg daily rabeprazole sod dr 20 mg lipitor vs zocor generic brand flagyl tablets 400mg price proscar best time take azithromycin shot them liquid omega 3 fish oil lipitor generics pramipexole other drugs in same class as amoxicillin generic amoxicillin 500 mg online cialis reviews 10 mg opana clarithromycin hexal 250 mg verhütung bisoprolol ct 5 mg tabletten suizid ketoconazole 20 mg shampoo and conditioner cytotec pills for sale dubai truck prevacid generic cvs brands what is a generic for lexapro quitting 10 mg lexapro cold turkey lipitor generic atorvastatin recall how to get a prescription for viagra in australia amlodipine liquid 0.5 mg cual es el nombre generico de bactrim naproxen 375 milligram tablets for sale seroquel 25 mg anxiety test nursing responsibilities in giving furosemide infusion erythromycin in batrafen alkeran nombre generico de norvasc endep online cantu a tenoretic generic name generic substitute for metoprolol image of clopidogrel 75 mg 50 mg doxycycline vs oracea 40 best acne medicine other than accutane side pot lua augmentin in timpul sarcinii generico de atorvastatina spironolactone 50 mg tab amne loreal ideal moisture ingredients in benadryl buy vip 100mg viagra tenoretic reviews on chlamydia doxycycline mg coreg 40 mg and diarrhea acyclovir tabletas de 800 mg dosis font duloxetine hcl dr 30 mg capsules progesterone in oil side effects ivf injections atenolol anxiety disorder amoxicillin antibiotics safe pregnancy is sulfa in flagyl how much accutane costs viagra in turkey price prevacid solutab cut in half plavix 75 mg pzn vermox online bestellen jetzt liquid dramamine for cats para que serve remedio depakote generic médicament celebrex 100 mg buy viagra in a single pill purchase cialis over counter crestor 20 mg obat apa dexamethasone pret lagosa 150 mg wellbutrin zoloft off brand where is viagra sold in miami fl what is the reciprocal of 19 in fraction form voltaren 50 mg cena composimold ingredients in aleve buy keflex whartisthebestin mustela cradle cap ingredients in aleve 100 mg lamictal pregnancy autism nhs prices viagra uk in metronidazole stada 400 mg chlamydia 81 mg aspirin overdose symptoms apo enalapril 10 mg pioglitazone mechanism of action smith usa ranbaxy viagra 100mg price in chennai sedipin 5 mg lexapro metoprolol use in diabetes loreal powercell repair ingredients in aleve cytotec safe while nursing order alesse tablets online 1 gram azithromycin treat chlamydia buy cheap generic wellbutrin sr 150mg fedex benadryl in french ya hay cialis generico carafate drug price singulair sold over the counter order benazepril hereisthebestin differin adapalene cream 0 30 in spanish orlistate germed comprar phenytoin dosing in status epilepticus medication can i buy fluconazole oral rinse ampicillin hereisthebestin australia phenazopyridine hcl uk progesterone cream over the counter canada doxycycline dose adjustment in renal failure es necesaria receta para comprar cialis benadryl safe to take daily lithium 300 mg night sildora 50 mg benadryl tretinoin gel chemist warehouse sandoz bisoprolol 5 mg effects secondaires arret tamsulosin 0 4 mg ingredients for lasagna mixing pulmicort and albuterol in nebulizer evista 60 mg estrogen dulcolax safe breast feeding order doxycycline hyclate online atacand prospect 16 mg hydromorphone trazodone 50 ml real brand name viagra cialis one a day cost at cvs lalu yadav in aap ki adalat salman acquistare kamagra in italia atacand plus 1612 5 mg tabletten acai juice brand fosamax drug generic nexium granule generic tablouri celebrex cu femei in varsta trandate iv vademecum online doxycycline liquid suspension is bactrim ds safe crestor in diabetics buy genuine nolvadex xeloda 500mg review get proscar uk lipitor generic patent apa itu orlistat 120 mg uk liquid omeprazole suspension uk proactiv pore refining peel ingredients in aleve cyklokapron side effects cramps in calf levitra in kapstadt kaufen amitriptyline weight gain 10 mg adderall is 2 doses of 150mg diflucan safe during pregnancy opecipro 500 mg amoxicillin ketoconazole shampoo boots price abilify anxiety user reviews ibi supplier in us ampicillin diovan comp 80 mg 12 5 mg buy clomid and nolvadex no prescription enaladex generic zyrtec is it possible to buy viagra online viagra gold kaufen clozapine 600 mg singulair 10mg medical store in delhi viagra pen for sale atenololo 100 mg compresse does doxycycline cause muscle spasms in dog cefuroxime 250 mg 5ml is how many ounces donde comprar viagra enfemenino en colombia los objetos paroxetine hcl for sale online dimefor 500 mg metformin for weight prochlorperazine maleate 10 mg cpt code generico de cipro 500 how much are sildenafil teva 100mg to buy azithromycin 500 mg 3 vs 5 days for sinusitis can i buy naproxen 250mg menthoxypropanediol ingredients in aleve cialis 5 mg dove comprarlo comprar cialis generico en españa envio rapido s a marit armata generic nexium how many tyrosine amino acids are in thyroxine hormone ditropan 5 mg para se utilizaban order serophene now mirtazapine 30 mg erfahrungen bon diclofenac eg retard 75 mg en alcohol allopurinol generika logo do they have benadryl in france wellbutrin sr 150mg cost buy one 2g dose of flagyl for dogs donde comprar levonorgestrel kamagra 100 mg halve noms d acteurs celebrex generic name best ivermectin wormer gemfibrozil 300 mg laboratorio chile sa ja tem generico cialis where we can buy viagra in chennai bula remedio enalapril 10 mg rabeprazole sodium ec domperidone sr capsules for sale can you get high on mobic 15 mg viagra price estonia best time take reglan caverta 100 mg uk auto venlafaxine retard 37 5 mg bijwerkingen antibiotica marrakesh kahm ingredients in aleve metoprolol 25 mg er tab pardon wellbutrin xl discount rx where can i buy pure acai berry in canada price of lamisil in rupees nizoral shampoo uk boots pharmacy coming off celexa safely home purinethol 50 mg 25 tablet sat?? prednisone use in lung cancer voltaren 100 mg rp vardenafil generic .au viagra european pharmacy best antacid when taking cialis cozaar 50 mg farmacia popular curitiba estradiol pattern in normal menstrual cycle 800 mg motrin drowsiness claritin nasal spray availability online porro cervere viagra generic trazodone 100 mg tab apo triamterene hctz 75 mg 50 mg tablets acai berry supplements ukc 2.5 mgs celexa viagra in spra cat costa ofloxacina allegra via articles kristian rother in bib j d watson citalopram canadian pharmacy canada celexa price amitriptyline side effects ukulele tetracycline 250 mg comprimidos masticables is metronidazole gel over the counter novamoxin 250 mg amoxicillin bottle and liquid linezolid 600 mg 300 ml milk mirtazapine uk nhs levitra generico in farmacia natural amlodipine brand names 40 mg lisinopril and 20 mg atenolol and 25 mg of hctz phenytoin 100 mg thuoc nam is zofran safe to take with metformin cialis generico o originale topamax for intermittent explosive disorder viagra erection disorder menubuy hoodia pills

Donald P. Delaney, 
Senior Investigator New York State Police

Dorothy E. Denning, 
Professor and Chair Computer Science Department, Georgetown University

John Kaye, County Prosecutor Monmouth County, New Jersey

Alan R. McDonald, 
Special Assistant to the Assistant Director Technical Services Division, FBI

1. Introduction

Although wiretaps are generally illegal in the United States, the
federal government and the governments of thirty seven states have been
authorized through federal and state legislation to intercept wire and
electronic communications under certain stringent rules which include
obtaining a court order. These rules have been designed to ensure the
protection of individual privacy and Fourth Amendment rights, while
permitting the use of wiretaps for investigations of serious criminal
activity and for foreign intelligence.

This article describes the legal requirements for government
interceptions of wire and electronic communications and some of the
additional procedures and practices followed by federal and state
agencies. The legal requirements are rooted in two pieces of federal
legislation: the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III
of the Act (hereafter "Title III")), passed in 1968, and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed in 1978. Title III
established the basic law for federal and state law enforcement
interceptions performed for the purpose of criminal investigations,
while FISA established the law for federal-level interceptions performed
for intelligence and counterintelligence operations. We will first
describe Title III interceptions and then describe FISA interceptions.

 2. Title III Interceptions

Title III, as amended (particularly by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986), is codified at Title 18 USC, Sections 2510-2521.
These statutes provide privacy protection for and govern the
interception of oral, wire, and electronic communications. Title III
covers all telephone communications regardless of the medium, except
that it does not cover the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the handset and base unit. The
law authorizes the interception of oral, wire, and electronic
communications by investigative and law enforcement officers conducting
criminal investigations pertaining to serious criminal offenses, i.e.,
felonies, following the issuance of a court order by a judge. The Title
III law authorizes the interception of particular criminal
communications related to particular criminal offenses. In short, it
authorizes the acquisition of evidence of crime. It does not authorize
noncriminal intelligence gathering, nor does it authorize interceptions
related to social or political views.

Thirty seven states have statutes permitting interceptions by state and
local law enforcement officers for certain types of criminal
investigations. All of the state statutes are based upon Title III from
which they are derivative. These statutes must be at least as
restrictive as Title III, and in fact most are more restrictive in their
requirements. In describing the legal requirements, we will focus on
those of Title III since they define the baseline for all wiretaps
performed by federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

In recent years, state statutes have been modified to keep pace with
rapid technological advances in telecommunications. For example, New
Jersey amended its electronic surveillance statute in 1993 to include
cellular telephones, cordless telephones, digital display beepers, fax
transmissions, computer-to-computer communications, and traces obtained
through "caller-ID".

Wiretaps are limited to the crimes specified in Title III and state
statutes. In New Jersey, the list includes murder, kidnapping, gambling,
robbery, bribery, aggravated assault, wrongful credit practices,
terrorist threats, arson, burglary, felony thefts, escape, forgery,
narcotics trafficking, firearms trafficking, racketeering, and organized

Most wiretaps are large undertakings, requiring a substantial use of
resources. In 1992, the average cost of installing intercept devices and
monitoring communications was $46,492. Despite budget constraints and
personnel shortages, law enforcement conducts wiretaps as necessary, but
obviously, because of staffing and costs, judiciously.

2.1 Application for a Court Order

All government wiretaps require a court order based upon a detailed
showing of probable cause. To obtain a court order, a three-step process
is involved. First, the law enforcement officer responsible for the
investigation must draw up a detailed affidavit showing that there is
probable cause to believe that the target telephone is being used to
facilitate a specific, serious, indictable crime.

Second, an attorney for the federal, state, or local government must
work with the law enforcement officer to prepare an application for a
court order, based upon the officer's affidavit. At the federal level,
the application must be approved by the Attorney General, Deputy
Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, any Assistant Attorney
General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant
Attorney General in the Criminal Division designated by the Attorney
General. At the state and local level, the application must be made and
approved by the principal prosecuting attorney of the state (State
Attorney General) or political subdivision thereof (District Attorney or
County Prosecutor). The attorney must be authorized by a statute of that
state to make such applications.

Third, the attorney must present the approved application ex parte
(without an adversary hearing) to a federal or state judge who is
authorized to issue a court order for electronic surveillance. A state
or local police officer or federal law enforcement agent cannot make an
application for a court order directly to a judge.

Typically, a court order is requested after a lengthy investigation and
the use of a "Dialed Number Recorder" (DNR). The DNR is used to track
the outgoing calls from the suspect's phone in order to demonstrate that
the suspect is communicating with known criminals.

Title III requires that an application for a court order specify:

(a) the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application
and the high-level government attorney authorizing the application;

(b) the facts and circumstances of the case justifying the application,
including details of the particular offense under investigation, the
identity of the person committing it, the type of communications sought,
and the nature and location of the communication facilities;

(c) whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and
failed or why they would likely fail or be too dangerous;

(d) the period of time for the interception (at most 30 days -
extensions may be permitted upon reapplication);

(e) the facts concerning all previous applications involving any of the
same persons or facilities;

(f) where the application is for the extension of an order, the results
thus far obtained from the interception.

The process of making an application for a court order is further
restricted by internal procedures adopted by law enforcement agencies to
ensure that wiretaps conform to the laws and are used only when
justified. The following describes the process for the FBI and the New
York State Police.

2.1.1 FBI Applications

In order for an FBI agent to conduct an interception, the agent must
follow procedures that go well beyond the legal requirements imposed by
Title III and which involve extensive internal review. In preparing the
affidavit, the FBI agent in the field works with the field office
principal legal advisor and also with an attorney in the local U.S.
Attorney's Office, revising the documentation to take into account their
comments and suggestions. After the documents are approved by field
office management, they are submitted to the Department of Justice's
Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) in the Criminal Division and to
the FBI Headquarters (HQ). At FBI HQ, the documents go to the Legal
Counsel Division (LCD) and the Criminal Investigative Division (CID).
Within the CID, they are sent to the program manager of the criminal
program unit relating to the type of violation under investigation,
e.g., organized crime. The program manager determines whether the
subjects of the proposed interception are worthy targets of
investigation and whether the interception is worth doing. Attorneys in
the FBI's LCD and the DOJ's OEO further refine the documents.

After the documents are approved by the DOJ's OEO and by FBI HQ, they
are referred to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or above), who
reviews the documents and signs off on them. At this point, the DOJ
authorizes the local U.S. Attorney's Office to file the final version of
the documents (application, affidavit, court order, and service provider
order) in court. The U.S. Attorney's Office then submits the documents
and the DOJ authorization to a federal judge. The entire process can
take as long as a month.

The following summarizes the people and organizations involved in the
preparation or approval of the application and the issuance of a court

1. FBI agent
2. FBI field office attorney (principal legal advisor)
3. FBI field office management
4. Attorney in local U.S. Attorney's office
5. DOJ Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO)
6. FBI HQ Legal Counsel Division (LCD)
7. FBI HQ Criminal Investigative Division (CID)
8. DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or higher)
9. Federal District Court judge

 2.1.2 New York State Police Applications

Within the New York State Police, electronic surveillance is conducted
by Senior Investigators in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
In preparing an affidavit, the investigator works with the District
Attorney's Office (or, in the case of a federal investigation, the U.S.
Attorney's office) and with the BCI Captain of the investigator's troop.
(Wiretap applications can be made and approved by the State Attorney
General, but this is unusual.) The Captain assesses whether review by
Division Headquarters is necessary and confers with the Assistant Deputy
Superintendent (ADS) or Headquarters Captain for final determination. If
Headquarters review is deemed necessary, then all documentation is sent
to the ADS along with a memorandum, endorsed by the Troop Unit
Supervisor and the Troop or Detail Commander, requesting approval. If
Headquarters review is deemed unnecessary, then the memo is sent without
the documentation. Once the ADS and District Attorney (DA) approve the
application, the DA submits the application to a judge who grants or
denies the court order.

2.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Not all judges have the authority to grant court orders for wiretaps. In
New Jersey, for example, only eight judges are designated as "wiretap
judges" for the entire state. These judges are given special training to
be sensitive to personal rights of privacy and to recognize the
importance of telephone intercepts for law enforcement.

Before a judge can approve an application for electronic surveillance
and issue a court order, the judge must determine that:

(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing,
has committed, or is about to commit an offense covered by the law;

(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications
concerning that offense will be obtained through such interception;

(c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or
reasonably appear unlikely to succeed or to be too dangerous;

(d) there is probable cause for belief that the facilities from which,
or the place where the communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
such person.

In addition to showing probable cause, one of the main criterion for
determining whether a court order should be issued is whether normal
investigative techniques have been or are likely to be unsuccessful
(criterion (c) above). Electronic surveillance is a tool of last resort
and cannot be used if other methods of investigation could reasonably be
used instead. Such normal investigative methods usually include visual
surveillance, interviewing subjects, the use of informers, telephone
record analysis, and DNRs. However, these techniques often have limited
impact on an investigation. Continuous surveillance by police can create
suspicion and therefore be hazardous; further, it cannot disclose the
contents of telephone conversations. Questioning identified suspects or
executing search warrants at their residence can substantially
jeopardize an investigation before the full scope of the operation is
revealed, and information can be lost through interpretation. Informants
are useful and sought out by police, but the information they provide
does not always reveal all of the players or the extent of an operation,
and great care must be taken to ensure that the informants are
protected. Moreover, because informants are often criminals themselves,
they may not be believed in court. Telephone record analysis and DNRs
are helpful, but do not reveal the contents of conversations or the
identities of parties. Other methods of investigation that may be tried
include undercover operations and stings. But while effective in some
cases, undercover operations are difficult and dangerous, and stings do
not always work.

If the judge approves the application, then a court order is issued
specifying the relevant information given in the application, namely,
the identity of the person (if known) whose communications are to be
intercepted, the nature and location of the communication facilities,
the type of communication to be intercepted and the offense to which it
relates, the agency authorized to perform the interception and the
person authorizing the application, and the period of time during which
such interception is authorized. A court order may also require that
interim status reports be made to the issuing judge while the wiretap is
in progress.

2.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation where there is immediate danger of death or
serious physical injury to any person, or conspiratorial activities
threatening national security or characteristic of organized crime,
Title III permits any investigative or law enforcement officer specially
designated by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the
Associate Attorney General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of
any state or subdivision thereof, to intercept communications provided
an application for a court order is made within 48 hours. In the event a
court order is not issued, the contents of any intercepted communication
is treated as having been obtained in violation of Title III.

In New York State, even an emergency situation requires a court order
from a judge. However, the judge may grant a temporary court order based
on an oral application from the District Attorney. The oral
communication must be recorded and transcribed, and must be followed by
a written application within 24 hours. The duration of a temporary
warrant cannot exceed 24 hours and cannot be renewed except through a
written application.

2.4 Execution of a Court Order

2.4.1 Installation of a Wiretap

To execute a court order for a wiretap, the investigative or law
enforcement officer takes the court order or emergency provision to the
communications service provider. Normally, the service provider is the
local exchange carrier. When served with a court order, the service
provider (or landlord, custodian, or other person named) is mandated
under Title III to assist in the execution of the interception by
providing all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance. The service provider is compensated for reasonable expenses
incurred. In light of rapid technological developments including
cellular telephones and integrated computer networks, the New Jersey
statute also requires the service provider to give technical assistance
and equipment to fulfill the court order. This requirement has not yet
been tested in court.

Normally, the government leases a line from the service provider and the
intercepted communications are transmitted to a remote government
monitoring facility over that line. In many cases, the bridging
connection is made within the service provider's central office
facility. Alternatively, a law enforcement agency may request the
service provider to give the "pairs and appearances" (a place to connect
to the suspect's line) in the "local loop" for the suspect's phone. A
law enforcement technician then makes the connection.

When a suspect's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the
person is attempting to evade or thwart interception), then a "roving"
wiretap, which suspends the specification of the telephone, may be used.
In this case, prior to intercepting communications, the officer must use
some other method of surveillance in order to determine the exact
location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. Once
determined, the location or telephone number is given to the service
provider for coordination and prompt assistance. The officer may not
intercept communications randomly in order to track a person (random or
mass surveillance is not permitted under any circumstances).

2.4.2 Minimization

Once any electronic surveillance begins, the law enforcement officer
must "minimize" -- that is, attempt to limit the interception of
communications to the specified offenses in the court order. Prior to
the surveillance, a federal or state attorney holds a "minimization
meeting" with the investigators who will be participating in the case to
ensure that the rules are followed.

Minimization is normally accomplished by turning off the intercept and
then performing a spot check every few minutes to determine if the
conversation has turned to the subject of the court order. This avoids
picking up family gossip. Special problems may arise where criminals
communicate in codes that are designed to conceal criminal activity in
what sounds like mundane household discussion. If an intercepted
communication is in a code or foreign language, and if someone is not
reasonably available to interpret the code or foreign language, then the
conversation can be recorded and minimization deferred until an expert
in that code or language is available to interpret the communication.
Should a wiretap fail to meet the minimization parameters, all of the
evidence obtained from the wiretap could be inadmissible.

2.4.3 Recording

All intercepted communications are to be recorded when possible. As a
practical mater, law enforcement officers make working copies of the
original tapes. In many instances at the state and local level, the
originals are delivered to the prosecutor's office and maintained in the
prosecutor's custody. The copies are screened by the case officer for
pertinent conversations (e.g., "I'll deliver the dope at 8:00 pm."). A
compilation of the relevant conversations, together with the
corroboratory surveillances often provides the probable cause for search
warrants and/or arrest warrants.

2.4.4 Termination of Electronic Surveillance

Electronic surveillance must terminate upon attainment of the
objectives, or in any event within 30 days. To continue an interception
beyond 30 days, the officer, through a government attorney, must apply
for and be granted an extension based upon a new application and court

When the period of a court order, or extension thereof, expires, the
original tapes must be made available to the issuing judge and sealed
under court supervision. The tapes must be maintained in such fashion
for 10 years.

2.5 Notification and Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Upon termination of an interception, the judge who issued the court
order must notify the persons named in the order that the interception
took place. Normally, this must be done within 90 days, but it may be
postponed upon showing of good cause. If the judge determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to make portions of the intercepted
communications available to the subjects, the judge may do so.

The contents of the communications may not be used as evidence in any
trial or hearing unless each party has received a copy of the
application and court order at least 10 days in advance of the trial,
and has been given the opportunity to move to suppress the evidence. A
motion to suppress the evidence may be made on the grounds that it was
not obtained in complete conformance with the laws.

2.6 Reports

Within 30 days after the expiration or denial of a court order, Title
III requires that the judge provide information about the order to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO). Each year the
Attorney General (or a designated Assistant Attorney General) must
report, on behalf of the federal government, to the AO a summary of all
orders and interceptions for the year; reports for state and local
jurisdictions are made by the principal prosecuting attorney of the
jurisdiction. The AO then integrates these summaries into an annual
report: "Report on Applications for Orders Authorizing or Approving the
Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications (Wiretap
Report)" covering all federal and state electronic surveillance,
including wiretaps. The 1992 report is about 200 pages and includes
information about each interception authorized in 1992, update
information for interceptions authorized in 1982-1991, and summary
statistics. The summary statistics include the following data (numbers
in parenthesis are the 1992 figures):

(1) number of interceptions authorized (919), denied (0), and installed

(2) average duration (in days) of original authorization (28) and
extensions (30)

(3) the place/facility where authorized (303 single family dwelling, 135
apartment, 3 multi-dwelling, 119 business, 4 roving, 66 combination, 289

(4) major offenses involved (634 narcotics, 90 racketeering, 66
gambling, 35 homicide/ assault, 16 larceny/theft, 9 kidnapping, 8
bribery, 7 loansharking/usury/extortion, 54 other)

(5) average number of (a) persons intercepted (117), (b) interceptions
(1,861), and (c) incriminating intercepts (347) per order where
interception devices were installed

(6) average cost of interception ($46,492)

(7) type of surveillance used for the 846 interceptions installed (632
telephone, 38 microphone, 113 electronic, 63 combination)

(8) number of persons arrested (2,685) and convicted (607) as the result
of 1992 intercepts

(9) activity taking place during 1992 as the result of intercepts
terminated in years 1982-1991, including number of arrests (1211),
trials (280), motions to suppress that are granted (14), denied (141),
and pending (37), and convictions (1450) (there is a lag between
interceptions, arrests, and convictions, with many arrests and most
convictions associated with a wiretap that terminated in one year taking
place in subsequent years)

Most of the above data is broken down by jurisdiction. Of the 919
authorized intercepts, 340 (37%) were federal. New York State had 197,
New Jersey 111, Florida 80, and Pennsylvania 77. The remaining 114
intercepts were divided among 18 states, none of which had more than 17
intercepts. During the past decade, the average number of authorized
intercepts per year has been about 780.

Individual law enforcement agencies also require internal reports. For
example, the New York Sate Police requires that each week, the Troop or
Detail Captain prepare a report summarizing the status of all
eavesdropping activity within the unit, including the productivity and
plans for each electronic surveillance installation and a brief synopsis
of pertinent activity. This is sent to the New York State Police
Division Headquarters Captain who prepares a report summarizing the
status of all eavesdropping installations.

One of the reasons for the significant amount of post wiretap reporting
is to provide a substantial record for legislatures when considering
whether or not to reenact or modify wiretap statutes.

 3. FISA Interceptions

Title 50 USC, Sections 1801-1811, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) of 1978, covers electronic surveillance for foreign
intelligence purposes (including counterintelligence and
counterterrorism). It governs wire and electronic communications sent by
or intended to be received by United States persons (citizens, aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, corporations, and
associations of U.S. persons) who are in the U.S. when there is a
reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for
law enforcement purposes; nonconsensual wire intercepts that are
implemented within the U.S.; and radio intercepts when the sender and
all receivers are in the U.S. and a warrant would be required for law
enforcement purposes. It does not cover intercepts of U.S. persons who
are overseas (unless the communications are with a U.S. person who is
inside the U.S.). Electronic surveillance conducted under FISA is

FISA authorizes electronic surveillance of foreign powers and agents of
foreign powers for foreign intelligence purposes. Normally, a court
order is required to implement a wiretap under FISA. There are, however,
two exceptions. The first is when the communications are exclusively
between or among foreign powers or involve technical intelligence other
than spoken communications from a location under the open and exclusive
control of a foreign power; there is no substantial risk that the
surveillance will acquire the communications to or from a U.S.person;
and proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth by
the law. Under those conditions, authorization can be granted by the
President through the Attorney General for a period up to one year. The
second is following a declaration of war by Congress. Then the
President, though the Attorney General, can authorize electronic
surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes without a court order for
up to 15 days.

Orders for wiretaps are granted by a special court established by FISA.
The court consists of seven district court judges appointed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. Judges serve seven-year terms.

3.1 Application for a Court Order

Applications for a court order are made by Federal officers and require
approval by the Attorney General. Each application must include:

(1) the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the Attorney General's approval;

(3) the target of the electronic surveillance;

(4) justification that the target is a foreign power or agent of a
foreign power (except no U.S person can be considered a foreign power or
agent thereof solely based on activities protected by the First
Amendment) and that the facilities or places where the surveillance is
be directed will be used by the same;

(5) the proposed minimization procedures, which must meet certain
requirements to protect the privacy of U.S. persons;

(6) the nature of the information sought and type of communications
subjected to surveillance;

(7) certification(s) by the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs or other high-level official in the area of national
security or defense (Presidential appointee subject to Senate
confirmation) that the information sought is foreign intelligence
information and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by
normal investigative methods;

(8) the means by which the surveillance will be effected;

(9) the facts concerning all previous applications involving the same
persons, facilities, or places;

(10) the period of time for the interception (maximum 90 days or, when
the target is a foreign power, one year);

(11) coverage of all surveillance devices to be employed and the
minimization procedures applying to each.

Some of the above information can be omitted when the target is a
foreign power.

Within the FBI, the process of applying for a court order under FISA is
as exacting and subject to review as under Title III. The main
differences are that under FISA, the FBI Intelligence Division is
involved rather than the Criminal Investigative Division, the DOJ Office
of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR) is involved rather than either
the U.S. Attorney's Office or the DOJ Criminal Division, and the
application is approved by the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney
General) rather than by a lower DOJ official.

3.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Before a judge can approve an application, the judge must determine that
the authorizations are valid; that there is probable cause to believe
that the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or
agent of a foreign power and that the facilities or places where the
surveillance is be directed will be used by the same; and that the
proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth in the
law. If the judge approves the application, an order is issued
specifying the relevant information from the application and directing
the communication carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified
person to furnish all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance and to properly maintain under security procedures any
records relating to the surveillance.

3.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation, the Attorney General or designee can
authorize the use of electronic surveillance provided the judge is
notified at the time and an application is made to the judge within 24
hours. If such application is not obtained, then the judge notifies any
U.S. persons named in the application or subject to the surveillance,
though such notification can be postponed or forgone upon showing of
good cause.

3.4 Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Like Title III, FISA places strict controls on what information can be
acquired through electronic surveillance and how such information can be
used. No information can be disclosed for law enforcement purposes
except with the proviso that it may only be used in a criminal
proceedings under advance authorization from the Attorney General. If
the government intends to use such information in court, then the
aggrieved person must be notified in advance. The person may move to
suppress the evidence.

3.5 Reports

Each year, the Attorney General must give the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts (AO) a report of the number of FISA
applications and the number of orders and extensions granted, modified,
or denied. In 1992, there were 484 orders. Since 1979, there has been an
average of a little over 500 FISA orders per year.

Because intercepts conducted under FISA are classified, detailed
information analogous to that required under Title III is not reported
to the AO, nor made available to the public. However, records of
Attorney General certifications, applications, and orders granted must
be held for at least 10 years, and the Attorney General must inform two
Congressional oversight committees of all surveillance activity on a
semiannual basis. These committees are the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on

Advanced TSCM Signals Detection and Analysis
TSCM - Sweeping the Spectrum for Eavesdropping Devices

Any comments or questions regarding this specific page?

Please feel free to sign our Guest Book

E-mail Address  
Web Page
Street Address
City (optional) State Zip
Country (optional)
Phone (optional)
How did you hear about this site or page?
Do you need to have a bug sweep or other TSCM service performed?
Do you need any TSCM equipment?

| Home | What is TSCM | Types of Bugs | Warning Signs You're Bugged |
| How To Behave if Bugged | TSCM Threat Levels | How To Engage a TSCM Firm |
| Qualifications | TSCM Protocol | Bug Frequencies | Phone Taps and Bugging |
| Signal Analysis | TDR Analysis | TDR Tutorial | Wiretapping | Training | Tools |
| Equipment | OSC-5000 | Kaiser | Riser Bond | Avcom | Search Rcvrs |
| Outside Links | Recommended TSCM Books | TSCM Reference Library |
| Recommended U.S. TSCM Firms | TSCM-L Mailing List |


    To be contacted for a confidential consultation
    please E-mail:

    or send a letter via US Mail to:
    James M. Atkinson
    Granite Island Group
    127 Eastern Avenue #291
    Gloucester, MA 01931-8008

    or call:
    Telephone: (978) 546-3803 / Fax: (978) 546-9467


Copyright ©2002, Granite Island Group