costo cialis generico farmacia paxil cr 25 mg generico lighting acyclovir 400 mg tablet for mono is fluconazole in the bactrim family vibramycin 100 mg cena cystone himalaya ingredients in aleve viagra pfizer uk foundation who makes generic fluoxetine porcelaine de digoxin prix iphone the best herbal viagra swiss diovan in renal failure indian aap ki adalat tetracycline tzf 250 mg cenar how many naproxen can you take in one day discount viagra sales is doxycycline available in australia betalin 12 generic viagra acai in energy drinks wellbutrin 450 mg high kamagra jelly uk via paypal side effects of furosemide in men is naproxen safe for pregnant novapirina diclofenac sodium 50 mg india tv aap ki adalat with narendra modi zantac best time to take it lipitor generic united healthcare prednisone and vitamin d metabolism in the body what mg of topamax is used for weight loss inexistencia de actos procesales topamax 25 mg prezzo warren ow long dos viagra stay in your sestom ciprofloxacin comprim?s usp 500 mg irbesartan 150 mg hexalab fluoxetine 5 mg for cats amoxicillin in german topamax side effects in teenagers buspar 10mg street price salep feldene piroxicam safe doses benadryl dogs magnorate 500 mg metformin keflex discount coupon aspirin costume gallery when will generic nexium available zantac otc generic codeine promethazine syrup buy ciprofloxacina 500 mg sirve para el dolor de garganta melting point of aspirin literature value chemistry valtrex guercmorteo for sale atorvastatin 80 mg in india terbinafine beta cyclodextrin tablets best etodolac 200 mg street value ribavirina generico do viagra citalopram 10 mg erfahrungen elefant cheap generic cialis for .50 each nombre generico valsartan cialis bula anvisa medicamentos percocet and 800 mg ibuprofen medicamentos antiarritmicos amiodarone 200 mg depakote nombre generico siesta mar hotel in calan porter menorca lamisil cream 15g cheap mylan paroxetine 40 mg redomex 10 mg posologie metronidazole nevotek 500 mg naproxen ventolin dose in pediatric is it legal to buy strattera and have shipped to canada aspirin 84 mg neurontin 100 mg capsule street value buy novo sildenafil for sale prednisolone eye drops prices 600 mg zithromax for dogs online temps de reference 800 mg motrin acetaminophen hydrocodone 325 mg 10 mg qua yellow oval cleocin 300 mg dosage for adults sambazon acai packs costco wholesale medicamentos contienen orlistat 120 mg super kamagra seri?s bestellen ranitidine safe infants clarithromycin generic in india amlodipine besylate 10mg tab price adverse effects of nifedipine in pregnancy generic viagra online master card india verapamil 240 mg twice a day antibiotics test progesterone cane costovertebral tenderness low dose naltrexone uk pharmacy como comprar o medicamento priligy doxycycline and acne review a fib ecg findings in digoxin get off lexapro 5 mg autovia toledo ciudad real trazodone prednisone buy online eu diflucan 150 kaufen nice online store buy cheap premarin cialis generique 20 mg quetiapine 25 mg indicaciones rav4 lopid 600 mg pfizer viagra priligy australia mastercard 28 black acai zutaten in nutella seroquel prices at kroger steece s pieces clomid for sale estrace discount maoi drug list zoloft generic name what mg prozac cialis paiement mastercard difference between ibuprofen and nsaids in pregnancy safe to take asprin with amoxicillin generic name for depakote ec zithromax for men buy lipitor 20mg in deutschland valor coumadin rummikub online side effect of plavix 75 mg when to take viagra pill for best results normal range for estradiol in men rosuvastatin teva 5 mg viagra online cs pollo rosa maria ingredients in aleve praziquantel 600 mg efeitos colaterais do viagra celexa pregnancy safety norvasc side effects prices pillensnijder proscar generic put a box around the most polar bond in cipro metformin 1000 mg 24 hour tablet amlodipine tablet 5 mg obat apazol voltaren rapid 25 uk ibuprofen 400 mg 1 or 2 scoops lasix and ringing in ears prednisone tapering schedule 40 mg eurax lotion cost andros sildenafil cost blood in semen and clopidogrel pom poms fresh arils ingredients in benadryl claritin allergy and sinus ingredients in cigarettes cost of cipro ear drops without insurance does daily 5 mg cialis build up in your blood valtrex whartisthebestin dosage cymbalta for sale online cefpodoxime brands names amoxicillin available over counter cozaar side effects 50 mg dexamethasone in civ fluconazole eye drops in nigeria market share of clopidogrel apo metoprolol 25 mg tablet sildenafil generico italia costo propecia online philippine acai smoothie packs online sotalol nombre generico de ibuprofeno depakine chrono 500 mg indications for albuterol proventil vari in inglese cosa wahl lithium ion plus review venlafaxine 37 5 mg twice a day medication abba generico augmentin and alcohol fluconazole 50mg chemist warehouse online meloxicam 15 mg to get high naproxen 500 mg warnings role of estrogen in ovulation induction with clomid zofran in pregnancy dose ensure clear apple ingredients in aleve anastrozole 1 mg steroids for dogs losartan 25 mg dosage where can i get viagra in sydney today cheap generic viagra in us with mastercard arnotts cruskits ingredients in aleve lynoral 0 01 mg used golf 30 pantoprazole 40 mg abilify 5 mg tabl goldbrand esomeprazole costo del medicamento aciclovir cost of brand name prozac without insurance lithium hydroxide solubility in ether generic viagra review forums meclizine 12 5 mg dog fucidin of leo in canada cipro 500 mg tablet fiyat? fancy pigeon for sale in uk zithromax effexor in am or pm indications for coumadin in atrial fibrillation sulfasalazine safe pregnancy cheap viagra 100mg us mebeverine hydrochloride safe sildenafil tablets 25 mg press plus 5 10mg generico de cialis generic finasteride viagra cost egypt cost of fenofibrate 160 mg take viagra best results simvastatin 20 mg grapefruit aciclovir suspension 200 mg dosis how many mg ibuprofen by weight viagra dosage in urdu amlodipine in english safe take maxalt every day cialis 50 mg hf ic acyclovir 400 mg information mefloquine malaria used in war motrin 400 mg grageas comentarios costa allegra irbesartan sandoz 300 mg misoprostol use in ghana does propecia make hair worse in females domperidone online uk visa motrin 200 mg ingredients in diet micardis cut in half prednisone and hair loss in black women ofloxacin api manufacturer india finasteride order uk bula artril 600 mg ibuprofen cialis safe shelf life beta estradiol alto causas de mareos allopurinol 300 mg used obat generic viagra eriacta aropax or zoloft generic name alldrugstore t35 com buy hoodia gordonii thyroxine 50 mg prix clindamycin lactation safety india tv aap ki adalat yasin malik marriage benadryl allergy liquid medicine is it safe for an 80year old male to use cialis famvir 125 mg katzenberg adalat sony reviews san miao wan ingredients in benadryl lamotrigine in refractory depression lincomycin 300 mg pediatricology allegra d safe in pregnancy acai juice genesis today reviews desethylene aripiprazole cost round yellow pill 100 synthroid generic welfare system in socialism what is simvastatin 40 mg tablets used for sambazon acai packs costco hours singulair medicine uk rankings what is clindamycin hcl 300 mg capsule paroxetine 25 mg crash cefpodoxime in cats minocin price scheriderm generico de crestor quetiapine fumarate generic name levonorgestrel de .75 mg aciclovir b.p. 800 mg over the counter equivalent to doxycycline what time of day is best to take topamax requip does it come in a patch carafate suspension uk ketoconazole soap uk spoilers l thyroxine online uk buy diovan 320 mg mestinon retard 180 mg nebenwirkungen exelon 9 5 mg plastry what is prometrium used for in ivf lyme disease antibiotics doxycycline for sale pamelor 10 mg e enxaqueca best price albuterol sulfate solution generic lamisil manufacturer voltaren injection price south africa cialis in sydney viagra tablet uk paypal where to buy pharmacy malaysia viagra eye drops chloramphenicol boots uk viagra prices in lahore pakistan promethazine liquid vs pill venlafaxine hcl cap sr 24hr 150 mg apo ondansetron 4 mg in pregnancy pentoxifylline trental 400 mg cr tablet walmart prices on cialis onde comprar naltrexone e bupropiona quem prednisone treatment for lymphoma in cats valsartan 160 mg hidroclorotiazida 12 5 mg buy dapoxetine online uk degrees doxycycline 100 mg bnf what is the street value of citalopram hbr 40 mg levothyroxine 75 mcg buy accutane 3 times a day in medical terms pamelor baownbeuv canada over the counter med like bactrim buy propecia online dubai zofran bernstein liebhard llp reviews amaryl 1 mg comprimate acoperite cabergoline for sale ukulele acai berry for sale philippines allopurinol dose in renal impairment diet images 240 mg verapamil asacol side effects uk map synthroid reviews for weight gain norimin or levlen generic genericos do levitra what is flagyl prescribed for in dogs zit zyban cost hoodia gordonii uk order differin gel 0 3 month swimsuits where can i buy metronidazole for trich cheap pills similar to viagra atorvastatin actavis 20 mg teilbar durch 375 mg seroquel is it safe to take motrin with alcohol gabapentin pills 100 mg taking 2 600 mg ibuprofen prescription flagyl over the counter drug alli weight loss pills review does diovan come in a generic form misoprostol bertibarots cost betnovate capilar comprar casa pregabalin vs gabapentin in diabetic neuropathy pantoprazole 20 mg preisvergleich deutschland cheap 20g cialisis diphantoine 100 mg gabapentin torsemide 5 mg cena broken viagra without a doctor prescription in texas what is metoprolol er succinate 25 mg entladekurve lithium ionen akkusativ il mio ragazzo usa il viagra how long does venlafaxine stay in your system dexamethasone 1 mg pregnancy symptoms cheap same day viagra tofranil 10 mg para sirve fenofibrate side effects 160 mg bupropion hcl xl 300 mg for smoking cessation anna hazare arvind kejriwal in aap ki adalat 2017 benicar lf08 precious metal prices medco prescription viagra cost nexium 40mg reviews active ingredient in benadryl tablets reciprocity states attorney paroxetine mesylate 20 mg gabapentin medsafe datasheet houses for sale artane d5 fluconazole thrush take two 300 mg atenolol al 50 mg vermox in stillzeit zovirax ointment cost los angeles atorvastatin generic exclusivity can i buy viagra over the counter nitroglycerin 0 4 mg tablet sl cymbalta 30 mg beads thyroxine side effects in humans accutane cost per month lang en lithium silicate sealer uk best place buy viagra online yahoo 1 month course accutane cost prandin 2 mg comprimidos timeline amoxicillin for canker sores for sale seroquel street prices 100mg tablets acquisto viagra in contrassegno disabili taking 400 mg of seroquel overdose metronidazole dosing in dialysis phenergan and patient safety what is the best time to wait after taking cialis erythromycin in wolff basiscreme telmisartan brand name of cipla pharmaceuticals qual o generico de zoloft retin a tretinoin 0 25 reviews on iphone venda de viagra online de portugal para o canada herbal viagra distributors in durban cephalexin 250 mg for en espanol prolopa 200 50mg generico do viagra effexor online petition prednisolone acetate backorder para que se usa la pastilla atenolol benicar hct genericon dutasteride 0.5 mg for mtf aralen chloroquine sanofi aventis canada wolkow sala bankietowa allegra price of cialis in new zealand viagra canadian order sarna inactive ingredients in synthroid coloxyl with senna ingredients in benadryl ibuprofen 200 mg caplets dosage of benadryl can you take nexium in the morning diovan price in pakistan of keo ridiculous high price of viagra krishnas advice to arjuna in tamil allegra 120 mgs black and decker 20 volt lithium drill walmart careers spironolactone e caduta capelli in allattamento para que es usada la medicina gabapentin 300 mg tastykake chocolate junior ingredients in benadryl vocal zone ingredients in benadryl aralen 500mg to ml ofloxacin 400 mg twice a day workout flonase over the counter substitute oxybutynin online bestellen cost of 1 gm of zithromax modecate injection 25 mg zoloft glanique levonorgestrel 0.75 mg remeron 30 mg side efects bactrim in pregnancy trimester review wellbutrin esomeprazole 20 mg acid reducer joseph c allegra papers richard a greenberg in cancer bactroban cream price mercury drug website antibiotico zithromax costovertebral angle side effects of taking simvastatin 40 mg minocin 100 costco celecoxib 200 mg indicaciones geograficas cetirizine hydrochloride tablets walmart proventil baownbeuv australia rosuvastatin 80 mg cialis en espana paypal online viagra sales uk purchase mobic guercmorteo divalproex 250 mg high what is a generic drug for lipitor naturolax ingredients in aleve cost of hyzaar 100 25 blood buspirone 15 milligram tablets on sale reverse da benicar generic reglan for nausea reviews on garcinia viagra super force with dapoxetine for sale 25 ml of zoloft viagra in guwahati omeprazole tablet usage statistics will taking 5 mg of cialis a day lower psa bach rescue remedy for pets ingredients in aleve 600 mg ibuprofen osha recordable incidents azithromycin 500 mg iv administration of vancomycin dublin bus artane roundabout unprescribed clomid uk daily mail onglyza generico de crestor side effects zoloft vs lexapro reviews maxalt 10 mg nebenwirkungen tetanusimpfung depo provera pcos treatment in ayurveda safe dosage range fluoxetine meclizine tablets 4 5 mg price atomoxetine 60mg misoprostol law and order svu zithromax price for azelastine nasal spray instructions in spanish adalat khan papers by munir khan about marketing naproxen sodium in aleve online synthroid no perescription zyatropin ingredients in aleve bactrim 800mg price buy fluconazole superdrug sildenafil andros effect in cycling ofloxacin dosage in fever costo exelon cerotti clopidogrel and metoprolol in myocardial infarction lexapro 5mg for anxiety reviews 36v lithium battery uk daily mail alli diet pill is available in delhi indiia buy extra strong female viagra uk trileptal 300 mg engorda de ganado medley flagyl metronidazol comprimidos 500 mg vytorin de 10 20 mg tamoxifen citrate 20 mg pctc floxapen 500 mg posologie zyrtec when did plavix become generic viagra vaginal suppository generic name benicar 40 mg equivalent diovan 80 oh yeah total protein system ingredients in benadryl what is the cost for 30 montelukast tablets does lisinopril come in 5mg griseofulvin 500 mg posologie metronidazole lariam dosage malaria treatment in uganda azithromycin in the uk brand proscar online order diovan hct tem generico renagel 800 mg vademecum for confessors metronidazole order generic viagra timing taking 300 mg wellbutrin sr once or twice levofloxacin 750 mg reviews uses of allopurinol in medicine order valtrex online overnight warfarin and ringing in the ears is there any discount programfor levitra vermox farmacie online oradea cefixime 200 mg posologie physiological action of progesterone in target tissues prevacid 24hr canada many mg benadryl does take get high hoodia gordonii onde comprar portugal flag bactrim liquid dosage hoodia gordonii donde comprar en argentina where can i buy acai berry diet pills generic lexapro price difference safe take sudafed pe zyrtec los mayates atacand online jobs minipress 2 mg retard alert wellbutrin generic par pharm venlafaxine xl 225 mg to g sildenafil dapoxetine in india buy orlistat medicine budesonide 3 mg cheap comprar viagra embalagem discreta amistad after patent expiration escitalopram generic omeprazole 40 mg bijsluiter medicijnen viagra canada pharmacy aspirin over the counter uk 50 mg prednisone blurred vision and sweating acute toxicity of methotrexate cost fenactol 75 mg benadryl can you buy viagra over the counter in shanghai can i buy azithromycin powder at the counter excel sildenafil india boss cephalexin online u s pharmacy order tadalafil 270 online strattera dosage 18 mg equals beloc 50 mg yorumlariniz aciclovir eg 200 mg canadian pharmacy pantoprazole
WIRETAP LAWS AND PROCEDURES
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE  U.S. GOVERNMENT TAPS A LINE


Donald P. Delaney, 
Senior Investigator New York State Police

Dorothy E. Denning, 
Professor and Chair Computer Science Department, Georgetown University

John Kaye, County Prosecutor Monmouth County, New Jersey

Alan R. McDonald, 
Special Assistant to the Assistant Director Technical Services Division, FBI

1. Introduction

Although wiretaps are generally illegal in the United States, the
federal government and the governments of thirty seven states have been
authorized through federal and state legislation to intercept wire and
electronic communications under certain stringent rules which include
obtaining a court order. These rules have been designed to ensure the
protection of individual privacy and Fourth Amendment rights, while
permitting the use of wiretaps for investigations of serious criminal
activity and for foreign intelligence.

This article describes the legal requirements for government
interceptions of wire and electronic communications and some of the
additional procedures and practices followed by federal and state
agencies. The legal requirements are rooted in two pieces of federal
legislation: the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III
of the Act (hereafter "Title III")), passed in 1968, and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed in 1978. Title III
established the basic law for federal and state law enforcement
interceptions performed for the purpose of criminal investigations,
while FISA established the law for federal-level interceptions performed
for intelligence and counterintelligence operations. We will first
describe Title III interceptions and then describe FISA interceptions.

 2. Title III Interceptions

Title III, as amended (particularly by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986), is codified at Title 18 USC, Sections 2510-2521.
These statutes provide privacy protection for and govern the
interception of oral, wire, and electronic communications. Title III
covers all telephone communications regardless of the medium, except
that it does not cover the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the handset and base unit. The
law authorizes the interception of oral, wire, and electronic
communications by investigative and law enforcement officers conducting
criminal investigations pertaining to serious criminal offenses, i.e.,
felonies, following the issuance of a court order by a judge. The Title
III law authorizes the interception of particular criminal
communications related to particular criminal offenses. In short, it
authorizes the acquisition of evidence of crime. It does not authorize
noncriminal intelligence gathering, nor does it authorize interceptions
related to social or political views.

Thirty seven states have statutes permitting interceptions by state and
local law enforcement officers for certain types of criminal
investigations. All of the state statutes are based upon Title III from
which they are derivative. These statutes must be at least as
restrictive as Title III, and in fact most are more restrictive in their
requirements. In describing the legal requirements, we will focus on
those of Title III since they define the baseline for all wiretaps
performed by federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

In recent years, state statutes have been modified to keep pace with
rapid technological advances in telecommunications. For example, New
Jersey amended its electronic surveillance statute in 1993 to include
cellular telephones, cordless telephones, digital display beepers, fax
transmissions, computer-to-computer communications, and traces obtained
through "caller-ID".

Wiretaps are limited to the crimes specified in Title III and state
statutes. In New Jersey, the list includes murder, kidnapping, gambling,
robbery, bribery, aggravated assault, wrongful credit practices,
terrorist threats, arson, burglary, felony thefts, escape, forgery,
narcotics trafficking, firearms trafficking, racketeering, and organized
crime.

Most wiretaps are large undertakings, requiring a substantial use of
resources. In 1992, the average cost of installing intercept devices and
monitoring communications was $46,492. Despite budget constraints and
personnel shortages, law enforcement conducts wiretaps as necessary, but
obviously, because of staffing and costs, judiciously.

2.1 Application for a Court Order

All government wiretaps require a court order based upon a detailed
showing of probable cause. To obtain a court order, a three-step process
is involved. First, the law enforcement officer responsible for the
investigation must draw up a detailed affidavit showing that there is
probable cause to believe that the target telephone is being used to
facilitate a specific, serious, indictable crime.

Second, an attorney for the federal, state, or local government must
work with the law enforcement officer to prepare an application for a
court order, based upon the officer's affidavit. At the federal level,
the application must be approved by the Attorney General, Deputy
Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, any Assistant Attorney
General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant
Attorney General in the Criminal Division designated by the Attorney
General. At the state and local level, the application must be made and
approved by the principal prosecuting attorney of the state (State
Attorney General) or political subdivision thereof (District Attorney or
County Prosecutor). The attorney must be authorized by a statute of that
state to make such applications.

Third, the attorney must present the approved application ex parte
(without an adversary hearing) to a federal or state judge who is
authorized to issue a court order for electronic surveillance. A state
or local police officer or federal law enforcement agent cannot make an
application for a court order directly to a judge.

Typically, a court order is requested after a lengthy investigation and
the use of a "Dialed Number Recorder" (DNR). The DNR is used to track
the outgoing calls from the suspect's phone in order to demonstrate that
the suspect is communicating with known criminals.

Title III requires that an application for a court order specify:

(a) the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application
and the high-level government attorney authorizing the application;

(b) the facts and circumstances of the case justifying the application,
including details of the particular offense under investigation, the
identity of the person committing it, the type of communications sought,
and the nature and location of the communication facilities;

(c) whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and
failed or why they would likely fail or be too dangerous;

(d) the period of time for the interception (at most 30 days -
extensions may be permitted upon reapplication);

(e) the facts concerning all previous applications involving any of the
same persons or facilities;

(f) where the application is for the extension of an order, the results
thus far obtained from the interception.

The process of making an application for a court order is further
restricted by internal procedures adopted by law enforcement agencies to
ensure that wiretaps conform to the laws and are used only when
justified. The following describes the process for the FBI and the New
York State Police.

2.1.1 FBI Applications

In order for an FBI agent to conduct an interception, the agent must
follow procedures that go well beyond the legal requirements imposed by
Title III and which involve extensive internal review. In preparing the
affidavit, the FBI agent in the field works with the field office
principal legal advisor and also with an attorney in the local U.S.
Attorney's Office, revising the documentation to take into account their
comments and suggestions. After the documents are approved by field
office management, they are submitted to the Department of Justice's
Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) in the Criminal Division and to
the FBI Headquarters (HQ). At FBI HQ, the documents go to the Legal
Counsel Division (LCD) and the Criminal Investigative Division (CID).
Within the CID, they are sent to the program manager of the criminal
program unit relating to the type of violation under investigation,
e.g., organized crime. The program manager determines whether the
subjects of the proposed interception are worthy targets of
investigation and whether the interception is worth doing. Attorneys in
the FBI's LCD and the DOJ's OEO further refine the documents.

After the documents are approved by the DOJ's OEO and by FBI HQ, they
are referred to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or above), who
reviews the documents and signs off on them. At this point, the DOJ
authorizes the local U.S. Attorney's Office to file the final version of
the documents (application, affidavit, court order, and service provider
order) in court. The U.S. Attorney's Office then submits the documents
and the DOJ authorization to a federal judge. The entire process can
take as long as a month.

The following summarizes the people and organizations involved in the
preparation or approval of the application and the issuance of a court
order:

1. FBI agent
2. FBI field office attorney (principal legal advisor)
3. FBI field office management
4. Attorney in local U.S. Attorney's office
5. DOJ Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO)
6. FBI HQ Legal Counsel Division (LCD)
7. FBI HQ Criminal Investigative Division (CID)
8. DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or higher)
9. Federal District Court judge


 2.1.2 New York State Police Applications

Within the New York State Police, electronic surveillance is conducted
by Senior Investigators in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
In preparing an affidavit, the investigator works with the District
Attorney's Office (or, in the case of a federal investigation, the U.S.
Attorney's office) and with the BCI Captain of the investigator's troop.
(Wiretap applications can be made and approved by the State Attorney
General, but this is unusual.) The Captain assesses whether review by
Division Headquarters is necessary and confers with the Assistant Deputy
Superintendent (ADS) or Headquarters Captain for final determination. If
Headquarters review is deemed necessary, then all documentation is sent
to the ADS along with a memorandum, endorsed by the Troop Unit
Supervisor and the Troop or Detail Commander, requesting approval. If
Headquarters review is deemed unnecessary, then the memo is sent without
the documentation. Once the ADS and District Attorney (DA) approve the
application, the DA submits the application to a judge who grants or
denies the court order.

2.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Not all judges have the authority to grant court orders for wiretaps. In
New Jersey, for example, only eight judges are designated as "wiretap
judges" for the entire state. These judges are given special training to
be sensitive to personal rights of privacy and to recognize the
importance of telephone intercepts for law enforcement.

Before a judge can approve an application for electronic surveillance
and issue a court order, the judge must determine that:

(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing,
has committed, or is about to commit an offense covered by the law;

(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications
concerning that offense will be obtained through such interception;

(c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or
reasonably appear unlikely to succeed or to be too dangerous;

(d) there is probable cause for belief that the facilities from which,
or the place where the communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
such person.

In addition to showing probable cause, one of the main criterion for
determining whether a court order should be issued is whether normal
investigative techniques have been or are likely to be unsuccessful
(criterion (c) above). Electronic surveillance is a tool of last resort
and cannot be used if other methods of investigation could reasonably be
used instead. Such normal investigative methods usually include visual
surveillance, interviewing subjects, the use of informers, telephone
record analysis, and DNRs. However, these techniques often have limited
impact on an investigation. Continuous surveillance by police can create
suspicion and therefore be hazardous; further, it cannot disclose the
contents of telephone conversations. Questioning identified suspects or
executing search warrants at their residence can substantially
jeopardize an investigation before the full scope of the operation is
revealed, and information can be lost through interpretation. Informants
are useful and sought out by police, but the information they provide
does not always reveal all of the players or the extent of an operation,
and great care must be taken to ensure that the informants are
protected. Moreover, because informants are often criminals themselves,
they may not be believed in court. Telephone record analysis and DNRs
are helpful, but do not reveal the contents of conversations or the
identities of parties. Other methods of investigation that may be tried
include undercover operations and stings. But while effective in some
cases, undercover operations are difficult and dangerous, and stings do
not always work.

If the judge approves the application, then a court order is issued
specifying the relevant information given in the application, namely,
the identity of the person (if known) whose communications are to be
intercepted, the nature and location of the communication facilities,
the type of communication to be intercepted and the offense to which it
relates, the agency authorized to perform the interception and the
person authorizing the application, and the period of time during which
such interception is authorized. A court order may also require that
interim status reports be made to the issuing judge while the wiretap is
in progress.

2.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation where there is immediate danger of death or
serious physical injury to any person, or conspiratorial activities
threatening national security or characteristic of organized crime,
Title III permits any investigative or law enforcement officer specially
designated by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the
Associate Attorney General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of
any state or subdivision thereof, to intercept communications provided
an application for a court order is made within 48 hours. In the event a
court order is not issued, the contents of any intercepted communication
is treated as having been obtained in violation of Title III.

In New York State, even an emergency situation requires a court order
from a judge. However, the judge may grant a temporary court order based
on an oral application from the District Attorney. The oral
communication must be recorded and transcribed, and must be followed by
a written application within 24 hours. The duration of a temporary
warrant cannot exceed 24 hours and cannot be renewed except through a
written application.

2.4 Execution of a Court Order

2.4.1 Installation of a Wiretap

To execute a court order for a wiretap, the investigative or law
enforcement officer takes the court order or emergency provision to the
communications service provider. Normally, the service provider is the
local exchange carrier. When served with a court order, the service
provider (or landlord, custodian, or other person named) is mandated
under Title III to assist in the execution of the interception by
providing all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance. The service provider is compensated for reasonable expenses
incurred. In light of rapid technological developments including
cellular telephones and integrated computer networks, the New Jersey
statute also requires the service provider to give technical assistance
and equipment to fulfill the court order. This requirement has not yet
been tested in court.

Normally, the government leases a line from the service provider and the
intercepted communications are transmitted to a remote government
monitoring facility over that line. In many cases, the bridging
connection is made within the service provider's central office
facility. Alternatively, a law enforcement agency may request the
service provider to give the "pairs and appearances" (a place to connect
to the suspect's line) in the "local loop" for the suspect's phone. A
law enforcement technician then makes the connection.

When a suspect's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the
person is attempting to evade or thwart interception), then a "roving"
wiretap, which suspends the specification of the telephone, may be used.
In this case, prior to intercepting communications, the officer must use
some other method of surveillance in order to determine the exact
location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. Once
determined, the location or telephone number is given to the service
provider for coordination and prompt assistance. The officer may not
intercept communications randomly in order to track a person (random or
mass surveillance is not permitted under any circumstances).

2.4.2 Minimization

Once any electronic surveillance begins, the law enforcement officer
must "minimize" -- that is, attempt to limit the interception of
communications to the specified offenses in the court order. Prior to
the surveillance, a federal or state attorney holds a "minimization
meeting" with the investigators who will be participating in the case to
ensure that the rules are followed.

Minimization is normally accomplished by turning off the intercept and
then performing a spot check every few minutes to determine if the
conversation has turned to the subject of the court order. This avoids
picking up family gossip. Special problems may arise where criminals
communicate in codes that are designed to conceal criminal activity in
what sounds like mundane household discussion. If an intercepted
communication is in a code or foreign language, and if someone is not
reasonably available to interpret the code or foreign language, then the
conversation can be recorded and minimization deferred until an expert
in that code or language is available to interpret the communication.
Should a wiretap fail to meet the minimization parameters, all of the
evidence obtained from the wiretap could be inadmissible.

2.4.3 Recording

All intercepted communications are to be recorded when possible. As a
practical mater, law enforcement officers make working copies of the
original tapes. In many instances at the state and local level, the
originals are delivered to the prosecutor's office and maintained in the
prosecutor's custody. The copies are screened by the case officer for
pertinent conversations (e.g., "I'll deliver the dope at 8:00 pm."). A
compilation of the relevant conversations, together with the
corroboratory surveillances often provides the probable cause for search
warrants and/or arrest warrants.

2.4.4 Termination of Electronic Surveillance

Electronic surveillance must terminate upon attainment of the
objectives, or in any event within 30 days. To continue an interception
beyond 30 days, the officer, through a government attorney, must apply
for and be granted an extension based upon a new application and court
order.

When the period of a court order, or extension thereof, expires, the
original tapes must be made available to the issuing judge and sealed
under court supervision. The tapes must be maintained in such fashion
for 10 years.

2.5 Notification and Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Upon termination of an interception, the judge who issued the court
order must notify the persons named in the order that the interception
took place. Normally, this must be done within 90 days, but it may be
postponed upon showing of good cause. If the judge determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to make portions of the intercepted
communications available to the subjects, the judge may do so.

The contents of the communications may not be used as evidence in any
trial or hearing unless each party has received a copy of the
application and court order at least 10 days in advance of the trial,
and has been given the opportunity to move to suppress the evidence. A
motion to suppress the evidence may be made on the grounds that it was
not obtained in complete conformance with the laws.

2.6 Reports

Within 30 days after the expiration or denial of a court order, Title
III requires that the judge provide information about the order to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO). Each year the
Attorney General (or a designated Assistant Attorney General) must
report, on behalf of the federal government, to the AO a summary of all
orders and interceptions for the year; reports for state and local
jurisdictions are made by the principal prosecuting attorney of the
jurisdiction. The AO then integrates these summaries into an annual
report: "Report on Applications for Orders Authorizing or Approving the
Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications (Wiretap
Report)" covering all federal and state electronic surveillance,
including wiretaps. The 1992 report is about 200 pages and includes
information about each interception authorized in 1992, update
information for interceptions authorized in 1982-1991, and summary
statistics. The summary statistics include the following data (numbers
in parenthesis are the 1992 figures):

(1) number of interceptions authorized (919), denied (0), and installed
(846)

(2) average duration (in days) of original authorization (28) and
extensions (30)

(3) the place/facility where authorized (303 single family dwelling, 135
apartment, 3 multi-dwelling, 119 business, 4 roving, 66 combination, 289
other)

(4) major offenses involved (634 narcotics, 90 racketeering, 66
gambling, 35 homicide/ assault, 16 larceny/theft, 9 kidnapping, 8
bribery, 7 loansharking/usury/extortion, 54 other)

(5) average number of (a) persons intercepted (117), (b) interceptions
(1,861), and (c) incriminating intercepts (347) per order where
interception devices were installed

(6) average cost of interception ($46,492)

(7) type of surveillance used for the 846 interceptions installed (632
telephone, 38 microphone, 113 electronic, 63 combination)

(8) number of persons arrested (2,685) and convicted (607) as the result
of 1992 intercepts

(9) activity taking place during 1992 as the result of intercepts
terminated in years 1982-1991, including number of arrests (1211),
trials (280), motions to suppress that are granted (14), denied (141),
and pending (37), and convictions (1450) (there is a lag between
interceptions, arrests, and convictions, with many arrests and most
convictions associated with a wiretap that terminated in one year taking
place in subsequent years)

Most of the above data is broken down by jurisdiction. Of the 919
authorized intercepts, 340 (37%) were federal. New York State had 197,
New Jersey 111, Florida 80, and Pennsylvania 77. The remaining 114
intercepts were divided among 18 states, none of which had more than 17
intercepts. During the past decade, the average number of authorized
intercepts per year has been about 780.

Individual law enforcement agencies also require internal reports. For
example, the New York Sate Police requires that each week, the Troop or
Detail Captain prepare a report summarizing the status of all
eavesdropping activity within the unit, including the productivity and
plans for each electronic surveillance installation and a brief synopsis
of pertinent activity. This is sent to the New York State Police
Division Headquarters Captain who prepares a report summarizing the
status of all eavesdropping installations.

One of the reasons for the significant amount of post wiretap reporting
is to provide a substantial record for legislatures when considering
whether or not to reenact or modify wiretap statutes.

 3. FISA Interceptions

Title 50 USC, Sections 1801-1811, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) of 1978, covers electronic surveillance for foreign
intelligence purposes (including counterintelligence and
counterterrorism). It governs wire and electronic communications sent by
or intended to be received by United States persons (citizens, aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, corporations, and
associations of U.S. persons) who are in the U.S. when there is a
reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for
law enforcement purposes; nonconsensual wire intercepts that are
implemented within the U.S.; and radio intercepts when the sender and
all receivers are in the U.S. and a warrant would be required for law
enforcement purposes. It does not cover intercepts of U.S. persons who
are overseas (unless the communications are with a U.S. person who is
inside the U.S.). Electronic surveillance conducted under FISA is
classified.

FISA authorizes electronic surveillance of foreign powers and agents of
foreign powers for foreign intelligence purposes. Normally, a court
order is required to implement a wiretap under FISA. There are, however,
two exceptions. The first is when the communications are exclusively
between or among foreign powers or involve technical intelligence other
than spoken communications from a location under the open and exclusive
control of a foreign power; there is no substantial risk that the
surveillance will acquire the communications to or from a U.S.person;
and proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth by
the law. Under those conditions, authorization can be granted by the
President through the Attorney General for a period up to one year. The
second is following a declaration of war by Congress. Then the
President, though the Attorney General, can authorize electronic
surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes without a court order for
up to 15 days.

Orders for wiretaps are granted by a special court established by FISA.
The court consists of seven district court judges appointed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. Judges serve seven-year terms.

3.1 Application for a Court Order

Applications for a court order are made by Federal officers and require
approval by the Attorney General. Each application must include:

(1) the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the Attorney General's approval;

(3) the target of the electronic surveillance;

(4) justification that the target is a foreign power or agent of a
foreign power (except no U.S person can be considered a foreign power or
agent thereof solely based on activities protected by the First
Amendment) and that the facilities or places where the surveillance is
be directed will be used by the same;

(5) the proposed minimization procedures, which must meet certain
requirements to protect the privacy of U.S. persons;

(6) the nature of the information sought and type of communications
subjected to surveillance;

(7) certification(s) by the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs or other high-level official in the area of national
security or defense (Presidential appointee subject to Senate
confirmation) that the information sought is foreign intelligence
information and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by
normal investigative methods;

(8) the means by which the surveillance will be effected;

(9) the facts concerning all previous applications involving the same
persons, facilities, or places;

(10) the period of time for the interception (maximum 90 days or, when
the target is a foreign power, one year);

(11) coverage of all surveillance devices to be employed and the
minimization procedures applying to each.

Some of the above information can be omitted when the target is a
foreign power.

Within the FBI, the process of applying for a court order under FISA is
as exacting and subject to review as under Title III. The main
differences are that under FISA, the FBI Intelligence Division is
involved rather than the Criminal Investigative Division, the DOJ Office
of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR) is involved rather than either
the U.S. Attorney's Office or the DOJ Criminal Division, and the
application is approved by the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney
General) rather than by a lower DOJ official.

3.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Before a judge can approve an application, the judge must determine that
the authorizations are valid; that there is probable cause to believe
that the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or
agent of a foreign power and that the facilities or places where the
surveillance is be directed will be used by the same; and that the
proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth in the
law. If the judge approves the application, an order is issued
specifying the relevant information from the application and directing
the communication carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified
person to furnish all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance and to properly maintain under security procedures any
records relating to the surveillance.

3.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation, the Attorney General or designee can
authorize the use of electronic surveillance provided the judge is
notified at the time and an application is made to the judge within 24
hours. If such application is not obtained, then the judge notifies any
U.S. persons named in the application or subject to the surveillance,
though such notification can be postponed or forgone upon showing of
good cause.

3.4 Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Like Title III, FISA places strict controls on what information can be
acquired through electronic surveillance and how such information can be
used. No information can be disclosed for law enforcement purposes
except with the proviso that it may only be used in a criminal
proceedings under advance authorization from the Attorney General. If
the government intends to use such information in court, then the
aggrieved person must be notified in advance. The person may move to
suppress the evidence.

3.5 Reports

Each year, the Attorney General must give the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts (AO) a report of the number of FISA
applications and the number of orders and extensions granted, modified,
or denied. In 1992, there were 484 orders. Since 1979, there has been an
average of a little over 500 FISA orders per year.

Because intercepts conducted under FISA are classified, detailed
information analogous to that required under Title III is not reported
to the AO, nor made available to the public. However, records of
Attorney General certifications, applications, and orders granted must
be held for at least 10 years, and the Attorney General must inform two
Congressional oversight committees of all surveillance activity on a
semiannual basis. These committees are the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence.


Advanced TSCM Signals Detection and Analysis
TSCM - Sweeping the Spectrum for Eavesdropping Devices

Any comments or questions regarding this specific page?

Please feel free to sign our Guest Book

Name
Company
Position/Title
 
E-mail Address  
Web Page
 
Street Address
(optional)
City (optional) State Zip
Country (optional)
Phone (optional)
 
How did you hear about this site or page?
Do you need to have a bug sweep or other TSCM service performed?
Do you need any TSCM equipment?
 
Comments



| Home | What is TSCM | Types of Bugs | Warning Signs You're Bugged |
| How To Behave if Bugged | TSCM Threat Levels | How To Engage a TSCM Firm |
| Qualifications | TSCM Protocol | Bug Frequencies | Phone Taps and Bugging |
| Signal Analysis | TDR Analysis | TDR Tutorial | Wiretapping | Training | Tools |
| Equipment | OSC-5000 | Kaiser | Riser Bond | Avcom | Search Rcvrs |
| Outside Links | Recommended TSCM Books | TSCM Reference Library |
| Recommended U.S. TSCM Firms | TSCM-L Mailing List |


-----------------------

    To be contacted for a confidential consultation
    please E-mail: jmatk@tscm.com

    or send a letter via US Mail to:
    James M. Atkinson
    Granite Island Group
    127 Eastern Avenue #291
    Gloucester, MA 01931-8008

    or call:
    Telephone: (978) 546-3803 / Fax: (978) 546-9467

    URL: http://www.tscm.com/

Copyright ©2002, Granite Island Group