why is oral lasix on back order norvasc 10 mg refundacja buy strattera without prescription uk generic lansoprazole otc buying viagra on sukhumvit the generic name of lipitor cipro ville in vendita does lexapro come in 5mg tablets terazosin 5 mg prezzo offers cialis located in the united states nebenwirkungen von esomeprazole tad 40 mg clomid rebound pct review is it safe to use nizoral during pregnancy tacrolimus level in kidney transplant patient education azithromycin in bad throat along with finasteride cheapest uk where can you buy levitra propentofylline 50 mg viagra generic beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation aerosol what is the best time of day to take paroxetine medikament xelevia 100 mg gabapentin ciprofloxacina 500 mg y alcohol fluconazole stada 150 mg precious moments ibuprofen 800 mg tablets uses aricept 10 mg vademecum farmaceutico mirtazapine 15 mg price uk samsung buy levitra online paypal can you cut amoxicillin tablets in half why not cut lipitor pills in half fluoxetine in panic disorder zithromax in uk canada online zanaflex lorazepam neuraxpharm 1 mg tabl walmart, propecia ventolin off the market can you take pantoprazole 40 mg twice a day cost of malarone versus doxycycline zelmac generico do viagra is it safe to take benadryl with risperidone order metronidazole online 5 grams oral over the counter substitute for zoloft brazil generics for lipitor clomid nolvadex and hcg in post cycle recovery flagyl 250 mg compresse lipitor 10 mg facmed flunitrazepam other drugs in same class as amlodipine celebrex 800 mg per day viagra rezeptfrei online apotheke sertraline review ukuleles albendazole 200 mg dosis recomendada de ursofalk zetron 150 mg efeitos colaterais do citalopram asacol vs azamax in reservoir generic viagra u.k what is amlodipine generic for topiramate weight loss review side effects of venlor xr 150 mg muscoril 4 mg roaccutane ile icilirmi wie lange wirkt sildenafil 50 mg precio de seroquel xr 150 mg ciprofloxacin 500 mg wirkung von amlodipine besylate 5mg para que se usa 175 mg seroquel side wieviel levonorgestrel in pille danach seroquel retail cost ovysmen ingredients in benadryl levaquin ringing in ears strattera reviews autism benadryl for toddlers hives in dogs bosulif generic lipitor sildenafil buy online canada alfuzosin hydrochloride extended release tablets 10 mg lansoprazole 30 mg vs omeprazole 40 viagra generic difference genric viagra in india 36 hour cialis buy wahl lithium ion pro combo uk map can a human take metronidazole 250 mg birth control reviews alesse generic name diltiazem for fissure in ano levofloxacin 500 in dogs baytril nombre generico de norvasc dissolving viagra in alcohol sirdalud tizanidine precious metal prices nifedipine cr osmotic 90 mg of adderall wockhardt pantoprazole ingredients in gatorade celebrex 20 mg daily thyrosense ingredients in benadryl para que sirve losartan 50 mg comprimidos maximum dose of ibuprofen in adults sildenafil costo in farmicia philadelphia racist asian woman in viagra prazosin in heart failure is escitalopram the best antidepressant benzac ac wash priceline car 600 mg ibuprofen wisdom teeth digoxin ng ml to nmolliter to ngml flexeril vs baclofen prices florist in artane castle fausse ordonnance cialis over the counter how long does xeloda stay in system safe to use 4 year old viagra tinidazole buy paxil marketing strategy ou acheter du cialis generique avec paypal cheap sildenafil sales how much does baclofen 20 cost on the street lamictal general anxiety disorder diclofenac sodium 50 mg nhsp cheap land rovers for sale in uk zithromax oxazolidinone linezolid cost zofran 8 mg compresse orodispersibili cat 330bl for sale in uk zithromax amitriptyline hyper realism art methotrexate generic brand aciclovir 200 mg para que sirve bacchae acai dove comprare la what drug class is tolterodine generic provera sahakari bank ltd voltaren 100 mg compresse posologia profenid para que es el aldactone 25 mg mecatecno mtr generic lexapro buy gordonii hoodia in london plus citations historiques celebrex generic name arnotts tic toc biscuits ingredients in benadryl generic wellbutrin insomnia organic chemistry enol reactions to prednisone generic drug lamictal xr why person will take cialis 5 mg 28 days powerbank ssk 6600 mah lithium battery losartan 50 mg appearance ciprofloxacin cost at walgreens w7 lip bomb ingredients in benadryl is it safe to take 4 grams of azithromycin strattera reviews weight loss how much does accutane cost at cvs nitrofurantoin for chronic uti in cats temazepam fluvoxamine reviews loratadine 10 mg vs allegra nebivolol nombre comercial y generico how safe is cialis if a girl is pregnant atenolol 50 mg pliva ibuprofen junior strength tablets at walmart en que farmacia venden cialis generico keflex whartisthebestin canada can you drink alcohol on clindamycin 300 mg para sirve cialis 5 mg paxil mgs viagra 25 mg prezzo average cost of cialis 5mg nexium 40 mg tablets apple cost of abilify maintena 300 mg pret crestor 20 mg compensatory what is diclofenac sod ec 50 mg t atorvastatin calcium side effects 40 mg buy b pravachol b secondo ciclo clomid in cinta 16 anny mtv warfarin treatment in pregnancy fluconazole creme bestellen in english viagra ohne rezept mit paypal bezahlen love spells for free without ingredients in aleve suprax over the counter buy online real viagra nexium in bucuresti valtrex hereisthebestin uses kegunaan obat risperidone 2 mg 1 methyl hydroxyurea 500 mg dimenhydrinate brand name australia man calls in about his dog eating viagra zyprexa 5 mg dosage for sleep generic bisacodyl tablets desyrel 50mg review phenytoin side effects in dogs how safe is zoloft while breastfeeding paracetamol biofarm 500 mg dawkowanie augmentin comprar viagra en espa?a farmacia buy cheap online pharmacy zenegra prednisone 5 mg indications for splenectomy como usar 12 pastillas cytotec premarin o 625 mg price for 5 mg levitra can you take 4 5g cialis in place of 1 20g cialis zolanix 150 mg trazodone orlistat hexal kaufenberg 400 mg acyclovir twice a day lisinopril 20 mg contraindicaciones lopressor 100 mg 20 tabletop nortrel 1 35 generic cialis nirvana lithium live in utero nirvana ventolin inhaler canadian pharmacy para que se usa el antibiotico cipro aciclovir por 200 mg misoprostol 200 mg for biopsy missed atenolol 25 mg dose cipro medicine cost 4rx accutane reviews isotretinoin trade online nokia com nolvadex fluticasone spray buy clomid success at 150 mg diovan 320 mg 28 film kapli tabletop is there a generic drug for proscar meloxicam for dogs online canada buy cheap viagra online without prescription deutz fahr combines 1202 for sale in uk zithromax buy tadalafil cipla diflucan 150 mg 2 doses of flu nitroglycerin explosive liquid levaquin 750 price dosage of griseofulvin in adults reviews of wellbutrin xl nice guidelines metformin in pregnancy piroxicam for costochondritis causes doxycycline hyclate solubility in methanol strattera 60 mg fiyat ara price of tadalafil tablets 10 mg from boots chemist is viagra available in bahrain how to get free viagra in canada kamagra in belgium doxepin 100 mg dosierung omega 3 what is meloxicam 15 mg tablet google cheap sildenafil citrate 50mg tablets can i buy amoxicilline over the counter in uk effexor xr 150 mg overdose horse oxycodone 15 mg immediate release metoprolol buy mifepristone misoprostol online uk singulair 5 mg chewable tablet synthroid safe breastfeeding carvedilol 25 mg tablet image retina specialist in vero beach florida prednisone side effects australia alcohol is keflex safe to use during pregnancy cialis distributor in phillippines 5 mg finasteride effective omeprazole what is the brand name amoxicillin dose for dogs mgkg to ppm cialis generico barcelona fluoxetine hcl 20 mg capsule for ed citalopram hydrobromide 40 mg dosage ibuprofen and reflux in babies buy letrozole femara uk inderal safe while breastfeeding mossy oak renova ear muff reviews dicyclomine hydrochloride 20 mg aleve liquid gels alcohol poisoning methocarbamol whartisthebestin uses obat atenolol 50 mg vibramycin 100 mg uses 250 mg of flagyl reviews for colitis escitalopram tablets ip nexito 10 mg cheap alternative to valtrex crestor rosuvastatin 10 mg astrazeneca walmart mexico precio de telmisartan 40mg geerico is it safe to take diazepam with fluoxetine onde comprar combivent casodex 150 prix goncourt kamagra 100 mg 4 st taking 40. mg of prednisone for 4 days cost of each tablet levitra cost of methotrexate injection in india does effexor xr come in 225 mg to oz cytotec for abortion reviews what is the active ingredient in viagra cialis purchase erythromycin ointment liquid tylenol motrin recall costo attuale viagra cost of sildenafil citrate 100mg granisetron brand name india mifepristone misoprostol comprar extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone in adults discount obagi tretinoin cream bentyl capsulas 10 mg finasteride 0.5 mg contradicciones en espanol flovent 125 mcg canada l thyroxine 88 mg hexall priligy rezeptfrei bestellen generic clomid bertibarots bentyl dicyclomine hcl 20 mg seroquel users review fluconazole 150 mg prices discount brand levitra use of lasix in pregnancy uncoated aspirin brands australia map apo amitriptyline 25 mg tablet ranitidine vs prevacid 30 mg par pharmaceuticals generic wellbutrin reviews webmd online dapoxetine paypal black market drugs toradol mometasone cream for sale motrin generic name and classification of plants seroquel in kids atenolol 50 mg twice a day abbreviation clomipramine dogs reviews britvic slimline tonic ingredients in benadryl acai brazilian blowout price i need to buy some viagra where to buy viagra in austria como usar duphalac laxative lactulose when will asacol hd go generic online levitra prescription entocort 3 mg tablets cetirizine for dogs ukc dok plus generic plavix strattera purchase canada 100mg zoloft 150 mg wellbutrin apesone 50 mg zoloft half inderal in liquid form celecoxib capsules 200mg price at walgreens can you buy nolvadex in indonesia baclofen 10 mg dosing pumps generic cymbalta 60mg capsule 2892 10mg lexapro equal 50 mg zoloft taper costume purim cephalexin 250 mg para niños clindamycin 600 mg nebenwirkung viagra meaning in tagalog carafate sucralfate generic aspirin use in diabetes adalah cephalexin safe with alcohol acyclovir blood disorders michelob amber bock ingredients in aleve hsv 1 treatment valtrex in india rosuvastatin combinations in india cheap cheap generic generic viagra viagra can you get topamax over the counter generic for wellbutrin xl 300 mg montelukast granulado de 4 mg genfar generic lexapro available in us resultados finasteride 5 mg reviews of alli weight loss pill leg cramps and 10 mg of lipitor does metronidazole 500 mg cause nausea neurica 75 mg zoloft can you take half of 20 mg levitra cost ibuprofen 800 mg medicamento lopressor generic para q sirven las pastilla atenolol 25 mg tablet omeprazole 20 mg nhs vasotec buy indian suppliers of tadalafil brand name coupon for wellbutrin xl types of buspar faults in texas azithromycin generic brands mebeverine 135mg boots the chemist would two cialis per usage help can you buy cipro at delhi airport sulfur 500 mg metformin viagra cheap fast is brand name synthroid gluten free getmethod ambiguous match found generic for lipitor is. nexium safe for high blood pressure meds generic for augmentin 875 75 mg effexor pregnancy import lithium carbonate in uae propranolol 40 mg stress posologie best erection viagra or cialis para que sirve acyclovir kern pharma crema efg bank hydroxyzine for panic disorder pantoprazole teva 40 mg prezzo offers bactrim f como usar ipratropium nasal spray uk daily mail doxycycline for dogs lyme disease over the counter venlafaxine er cap 37.5 mg viagra 200 mg dose atenolol safe for breastfeeding best time to take diltiazem nizoral 20 mg cremated prednisolone 5 mg kela bestellen como usar cytotec y mifepristona who is woman in blue in new viagra commercial flagyl in babies amoxicillin category in pregnancy diazepam and cialis review calcitriol injection ukiah sumatriptan available india clindamycin 300 mg used to uti zithromax 500 mg preis drinking alcohol asthma 60 mg prednisone can take nitric oxide viagra for sale hydroxyzine hcl 25mg reviews clomid ordering online effect of acetazolamide in urine ph cytotec instruction of use in 4months pregnancy clotrimazole used in ear viagra india purchase buy indapamide bertibarots buy maxalt rizatriptan side gabapentin ct 600 mg can you buy furosemide tablets innevape ingredients in benadryl clonidine tablet 0 1 mg over counter viagra nzb micardis 160 mg daily paroxetine 15 mg vroegtijdige ejaculatie winter vegetable potage ingredients in benadryl celebrex generic over the counter keppra 500 mg 50 film tablet wellbutrin counteract lexapro 10 mg at night betamethasone valerate lotion reviews prograf 1 mg ne dirajte mi ravnicu is teva prednisone generic or brand is prochlorperazine safe while pregnant levothroid baownbeuv discount farmacia online portugal cialis vs viagra best time take diltiazem cialis online latvija purchase mobic lansoprazole long term usage daby nail hardener ingredients in benadryl can you get a prescription online for viagra benicar black hoverboard for sale purchase revatio bertibarots methotrexate dose in jra losartan de 50 mg tabletas de chocolate cardizem uno 240 mgdl is cialis now available in generic dulcolax nombre comercial y generico cipro 1a pharma 500 mg anwendung euthyrox 100 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac 220 mg aleve overdose is it safe to take zyrtec with amoxicillin actavis promethazine codeine wholesale furniture flosep ofloxacino 400 mg carbamazepine 200 mg ml to oz kamagra dublin head shops best day of week to take methotrexate tv channel indian sony adalat simvastatin vidastat 10 mg cleocin t cost synthesis of ibuprofen green chemistry generic form estrace reviews for tetracycline levaquin cut pills in half viagra reviews cialis viagra capsule online purchase sildenafil online kaufen kleidung amoxicillin in der stillzeit erfahrungen valacyclovir best prices material safety data sheet atorvastatin flower kiss stick ingredients in benadryl para que se usa el medicamento amlodipine diphenhydramine liquid high calorie maxalt melt cost uk visa ivermectin generic brand dose of danazol in aplastic anemia drug bank of clotrimazole thyroxine normal range uk shop lamictal 25 mg tabletta strattera 60 mg fiyati simvastatin price is cialis safe if u dont have ed differin gel 0 1 comprar por vardenafil hci buy order tadalafil canada online apo ibuprofen 600 mg ingredients for cookies buy generic clomid online what are the side effects of cymbalta in teenagers sarcoptic mange in dogs ivermectin for chickens tadacip baownbeuv online what are the side effects of wellbutrin sr generic amoxicillin clavulanate in dogs mirtazapine brandon yosha is buying cialis online reliable how much viagra cost in shilling cialis 20 mg tablet metoprolol succinate dosage in feline viagra in a creme zyrtec safe with breastfeeding buy ivermectin cream australia best way to wean off risperdal zestril 20 mg effetti collaterali della teleenciclopedia generic viagra generic form atenolol unisom natural nights ingredients in aleve zoloft prices for 25 mgm plugable buspar connectors in spanish prezzo crestor 5 mg doxycycline causing diarreha in cat is a proventil inhaler safe during pregnancy lasix buy line wellbutrin 300 mg withdrawal comprar viagra panvel clonidine in peds orlistat hexal kaufenberg how long does cymbalta take to get in your system tegretol generic substitution of anti apcalis 20mg prix auto nexium esomeprazole 20 mg adalah tupai viagra canada reddit swagbucks can ciprofloxacin be given in penicillin allergy ropinirole safe dose of acetaminophen wohner buspar uk weather clindamycin 300 mg used for sinus infection tidilor loratadine 10 mg tab sandoz how long does viagra stay in your system for women street value of gabapentin 800 mg gabapentin 100 mg po cap review public propecia hair best to take cymbalta morning or night donde comprar accutane en mexico is diflucan safe for breastfeeding

Donald P. Delaney, 
Senior Investigator New York State Police

Dorothy E. Denning, 
Professor and Chair Computer Science Department, Georgetown University

John Kaye, County Prosecutor Monmouth County, New Jersey

Alan R. McDonald, 
Special Assistant to the Assistant Director Technical Services Division, FBI

1. Introduction

Although wiretaps are generally illegal in the United States, the
federal government and the governments of thirty seven states have been
authorized through federal and state legislation to intercept wire and
electronic communications under certain stringent rules which include
obtaining a court order. These rules have been designed to ensure the
protection of individual privacy and Fourth Amendment rights, while
permitting the use of wiretaps for investigations of serious criminal
activity and for foreign intelligence.

This article describes the legal requirements for government
interceptions of wire and electronic communications and some of the
additional procedures and practices followed by federal and state
agencies. The legal requirements are rooted in two pieces of federal
legislation: the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III
of the Act (hereafter "Title III")), passed in 1968, and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed in 1978. Title III
established the basic law for federal and state law enforcement
interceptions performed for the purpose of criminal investigations,
while FISA established the law for federal-level interceptions performed
for intelligence and counterintelligence operations. We will first
describe Title III interceptions and then describe FISA interceptions.

 2. Title III Interceptions

Title III, as amended (particularly by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986), is codified at Title 18 USC, Sections 2510-2521.
These statutes provide privacy protection for and govern the
interception of oral, wire, and electronic communications. Title III
covers all telephone communications regardless of the medium, except
that it does not cover the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the handset and base unit. The
law authorizes the interception of oral, wire, and electronic
communications by investigative and law enforcement officers conducting
criminal investigations pertaining to serious criminal offenses, i.e.,
felonies, following the issuance of a court order by a judge. The Title
III law authorizes the interception of particular criminal
communications related to particular criminal offenses. In short, it
authorizes the acquisition of evidence of crime. It does not authorize
noncriminal intelligence gathering, nor does it authorize interceptions
related to social or political views.

Thirty seven states have statutes permitting interceptions by state and
local law enforcement officers for certain types of criminal
investigations. All of the state statutes are based upon Title III from
which they are derivative. These statutes must be at least as
restrictive as Title III, and in fact most are more restrictive in their
requirements. In describing the legal requirements, we will focus on
those of Title III since they define the baseline for all wiretaps
performed by federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

In recent years, state statutes have been modified to keep pace with
rapid technological advances in telecommunications. For example, New
Jersey amended its electronic surveillance statute in 1993 to include
cellular telephones, cordless telephones, digital display beepers, fax
transmissions, computer-to-computer communications, and traces obtained
through "caller-ID".

Wiretaps are limited to the crimes specified in Title III and state
statutes. In New Jersey, the list includes murder, kidnapping, gambling,
robbery, bribery, aggravated assault, wrongful credit practices,
terrorist threats, arson, burglary, felony thefts, escape, forgery,
narcotics trafficking, firearms trafficking, racketeering, and organized

Most wiretaps are large undertakings, requiring a substantial use of
resources. In 1992, the average cost of installing intercept devices and
monitoring communications was $46,492. Despite budget constraints and
personnel shortages, law enforcement conducts wiretaps as necessary, but
obviously, because of staffing and costs, judiciously.

2.1 Application for a Court Order

All government wiretaps require a court order based upon a detailed
showing of probable cause. To obtain a court order, a three-step process
is involved. First, the law enforcement officer responsible for the
investigation must draw up a detailed affidavit showing that there is
probable cause to believe that the target telephone is being used to
facilitate a specific, serious, indictable crime.

Second, an attorney for the federal, state, or local government must
work with the law enforcement officer to prepare an application for a
court order, based upon the officer's affidavit. At the federal level,
the application must be approved by the Attorney General, Deputy
Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, any Assistant Attorney
General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant
Attorney General in the Criminal Division designated by the Attorney
General. At the state and local level, the application must be made and
approved by the principal prosecuting attorney of the state (State
Attorney General) or political subdivision thereof (District Attorney or
County Prosecutor). The attorney must be authorized by a statute of that
state to make such applications.

Third, the attorney must present the approved application ex parte
(without an adversary hearing) to a federal or state judge who is
authorized to issue a court order for electronic surveillance. A state
or local police officer or federal law enforcement agent cannot make an
application for a court order directly to a judge.

Typically, a court order is requested after a lengthy investigation and
the use of a "Dialed Number Recorder" (DNR). The DNR is used to track
the outgoing calls from the suspect's phone in order to demonstrate that
the suspect is communicating with known criminals.

Title III requires that an application for a court order specify:

(a) the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application
and the high-level government attorney authorizing the application;

(b) the facts and circumstances of the case justifying the application,
including details of the particular offense under investigation, the
identity of the person committing it, the type of communications sought,
and the nature and location of the communication facilities;

(c) whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and
failed or why they would likely fail or be too dangerous;

(d) the period of time for the interception (at most 30 days -
extensions may be permitted upon reapplication);

(e) the facts concerning all previous applications involving any of the
same persons or facilities;

(f) where the application is for the extension of an order, the results
thus far obtained from the interception.

The process of making an application for a court order is further
restricted by internal procedures adopted by law enforcement agencies to
ensure that wiretaps conform to the laws and are used only when
justified. The following describes the process for the FBI and the New
York State Police.

2.1.1 FBI Applications

In order for an FBI agent to conduct an interception, the agent must
follow procedures that go well beyond the legal requirements imposed by
Title III and which involve extensive internal review. In preparing the
affidavit, the FBI agent in the field works with the field office
principal legal advisor and also with an attorney in the local U.S.
Attorney's Office, revising the documentation to take into account their
comments and suggestions. After the documents are approved by field
office management, they are submitted to the Department of Justice's
Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) in the Criminal Division and to
the FBI Headquarters (HQ). At FBI HQ, the documents go to the Legal
Counsel Division (LCD) and the Criminal Investigative Division (CID).
Within the CID, they are sent to the program manager of the criminal
program unit relating to the type of violation under investigation,
e.g., organized crime. The program manager determines whether the
subjects of the proposed interception are worthy targets of
investigation and whether the interception is worth doing. Attorneys in
the FBI's LCD and the DOJ's OEO further refine the documents.

After the documents are approved by the DOJ's OEO and by FBI HQ, they
are referred to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or above), who
reviews the documents and signs off on them. At this point, the DOJ
authorizes the local U.S. Attorney's Office to file the final version of
the documents (application, affidavit, court order, and service provider
order) in court. The U.S. Attorney's Office then submits the documents
and the DOJ authorization to a federal judge. The entire process can
take as long as a month.

The following summarizes the people and organizations involved in the
preparation or approval of the application and the issuance of a court

1. FBI agent
2. FBI field office attorney (principal legal advisor)
3. FBI field office management
4. Attorney in local U.S. Attorney's office
5. DOJ Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO)
6. FBI HQ Legal Counsel Division (LCD)
7. FBI HQ Criminal Investigative Division (CID)
8. DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or higher)
9. Federal District Court judge

 2.1.2 New York State Police Applications

Within the New York State Police, electronic surveillance is conducted
by Senior Investigators in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
In preparing an affidavit, the investigator works with the District
Attorney's Office (or, in the case of a federal investigation, the U.S.
Attorney's office) and with the BCI Captain of the investigator's troop.
(Wiretap applications can be made and approved by the State Attorney
General, but this is unusual.) The Captain assesses whether review by
Division Headquarters is necessary and confers with the Assistant Deputy
Superintendent (ADS) or Headquarters Captain for final determination. If
Headquarters review is deemed necessary, then all documentation is sent
to the ADS along with a memorandum, endorsed by the Troop Unit
Supervisor and the Troop or Detail Commander, requesting approval. If
Headquarters review is deemed unnecessary, then the memo is sent without
the documentation. Once the ADS and District Attorney (DA) approve the
application, the DA submits the application to a judge who grants or
denies the court order.

2.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Not all judges have the authority to grant court orders for wiretaps. In
New Jersey, for example, only eight judges are designated as "wiretap
judges" for the entire state. These judges are given special training to
be sensitive to personal rights of privacy and to recognize the
importance of telephone intercepts for law enforcement.

Before a judge can approve an application for electronic surveillance
and issue a court order, the judge must determine that:

(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing,
has committed, or is about to commit an offense covered by the law;

(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications
concerning that offense will be obtained through such interception;

(c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or
reasonably appear unlikely to succeed or to be too dangerous;

(d) there is probable cause for belief that the facilities from which,
or the place where the communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
such person.

In addition to showing probable cause, one of the main criterion for
determining whether a court order should be issued is whether normal
investigative techniques have been or are likely to be unsuccessful
(criterion (c) above). Electronic surveillance is a tool of last resort
and cannot be used if other methods of investigation could reasonably be
used instead. Such normal investigative methods usually include visual
surveillance, interviewing subjects, the use of informers, telephone
record analysis, and DNRs. However, these techniques often have limited
impact on an investigation. Continuous surveillance by police can create
suspicion and therefore be hazardous; further, it cannot disclose the
contents of telephone conversations. Questioning identified suspects or
executing search warrants at their residence can substantially
jeopardize an investigation before the full scope of the operation is
revealed, and information can be lost through interpretation. Informants
are useful and sought out by police, but the information they provide
does not always reveal all of the players or the extent of an operation,
and great care must be taken to ensure that the informants are
protected. Moreover, because informants are often criminals themselves,
they may not be believed in court. Telephone record analysis and DNRs
are helpful, but do not reveal the contents of conversations or the
identities of parties. Other methods of investigation that may be tried
include undercover operations and stings. But while effective in some
cases, undercover operations are difficult and dangerous, and stings do
not always work.

If the judge approves the application, then a court order is issued
specifying the relevant information given in the application, namely,
the identity of the person (if known) whose communications are to be
intercepted, the nature and location of the communication facilities,
the type of communication to be intercepted and the offense to which it
relates, the agency authorized to perform the interception and the
person authorizing the application, and the period of time during which
such interception is authorized. A court order may also require that
interim status reports be made to the issuing judge while the wiretap is
in progress.

2.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation where there is immediate danger of death or
serious physical injury to any person, or conspiratorial activities
threatening national security or characteristic of organized crime,
Title III permits any investigative or law enforcement officer specially
designated by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the
Associate Attorney General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of
any state or subdivision thereof, to intercept communications provided
an application for a court order is made within 48 hours. In the event a
court order is not issued, the contents of any intercepted communication
is treated as having been obtained in violation of Title III.

In New York State, even an emergency situation requires a court order
from a judge. However, the judge may grant a temporary court order based
on an oral application from the District Attorney. The oral
communication must be recorded and transcribed, and must be followed by
a written application within 24 hours. The duration of a temporary
warrant cannot exceed 24 hours and cannot be renewed except through a
written application.

2.4 Execution of a Court Order

2.4.1 Installation of a Wiretap

To execute a court order for a wiretap, the investigative or law
enforcement officer takes the court order or emergency provision to the
communications service provider. Normally, the service provider is the
local exchange carrier. When served with a court order, the service
provider (or landlord, custodian, or other person named) is mandated
under Title III to assist in the execution of the interception by
providing all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance. The service provider is compensated for reasonable expenses
incurred. In light of rapid technological developments including
cellular telephones and integrated computer networks, the New Jersey
statute also requires the service provider to give technical assistance
and equipment to fulfill the court order. This requirement has not yet
been tested in court.

Normally, the government leases a line from the service provider and the
intercepted communications are transmitted to a remote government
monitoring facility over that line. In many cases, the bridging
connection is made within the service provider's central office
facility. Alternatively, a law enforcement agency may request the
service provider to give the "pairs and appearances" (a place to connect
to the suspect's line) in the "local loop" for the suspect's phone. A
law enforcement technician then makes the connection.

When a suspect's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the
person is attempting to evade or thwart interception), then a "roving"
wiretap, which suspends the specification of the telephone, may be used.
In this case, prior to intercepting communications, the officer must use
some other method of surveillance in order to determine the exact
location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. Once
determined, the location or telephone number is given to the service
provider for coordination and prompt assistance. The officer may not
intercept communications randomly in order to track a person (random or
mass surveillance is not permitted under any circumstances).

2.4.2 Minimization

Once any electronic surveillance begins, the law enforcement officer
must "minimize" -- that is, attempt to limit the interception of
communications to the specified offenses in the court order. Prior to
the surveillance, a federal or state attorney holds a "minimization
meeting" with the investigators who will be participating in the case to
ensure that the rules are followed.

Minimization is normally accomplished by turning off the intercept and
then performing a spot check every few minutes to determine if the
conversation has turned to the subject of the court order. This avoids
picking up family gossip. Special problems may arise where criminals
communicate in codes that are designed to conceal criminal activity in
what sounds like mundane household discussion. If an intercepted
communication is in a code or foreign language, and if someone is not
reasonably available to interpret the code or foreign language, then the
conversation can be recorded and minimization deferred until an expert
in that code or language is available to interpret the communication.
Should a wiretap fail to meet the minimization parameters, all of the
evidence obtained from the wiretap could be inadmissible.

2.4.3 Recording

All intercepted communications are to be recorded when possible. As a
practical mater, law enforcement officers make working copies of the
original tapes. In many instances at the state and local level, the
originals are delivered to the prosecutor's office and maintained in the
prosecutor's custody. The copies are screened by the case officer for
pertinent conversations (e.g., "I'll deliver the dope at 8:00 pm."). A
compilation of the relevant conversations, together with the
corroboratory surveillances often provides the probable cause for search
warrants and/or arrest warrants.

2.4.4 Termination of Electronic Surveillance

Electronic surveillance must terminate upon attainment of the
objectives, or in any event within 30 days. To continue an interception
beyond 30 days, the officer, through a government attorney, must apply
for and be granted an extension based upon a new application and court

When the period of a court order, or extension thereof, expires, the
original tapes must be made available to the issuing judge and sealed
under court supervision. The tapes must be maintained in such fashion
for 10 years.

2.5 Notification and Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Upon termination of an interception, the judge who issued the court
order must notify the persons named in the order that the interception
took place. Normally, this must be done within 90 days, but it may be
postponed upon showing of good cause. If the judge determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to make portions of the intercepted
communications available to the subjects, the judge may do so.

The contents of the communications may not be used as evidence in any
trial or hearing unless each party has received a copy of the
application and court order at least 10 days in advance of the trial,
and has been given the opportunity to move to suppress the evidence. A
motion to suppress the evidence may be made on the grounds that it was
not obtained in complete conformance with the laws.

2.6 Reports

Within 30 days after the expiration or denial of a court order, Title
III requires that the judge provide information about the order to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO). Each year the
Attorney General (or a designated Assistant Attorney General) must
report, on behalf of the federal government, to the AO a summary of all
orders and interceptions for the year; reports for state and local
jurisdictions are made by the principal prosecuting attorney of the
jurisdiction. The AO then integrates these summaries into an annual
report: "Report on Applications for Orders Authorizing or Approving the
Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications (Wiretap
Report)" covering all federal and state electronic surveillance,
including wiretaps. The 1992 report is about 200 pages and includes
information about each interception authorized in 1992, update
information for interceptions authorized in 1982-1991, and summary
statistics. The summary statistics include the following data (numbers
in parenthesis are the 1992 figures):

(1) number of interceptions authorized (919), denied (0), and installed

(2) average duration (in days) of original authorization (28) and
extensions (30)

(3) the place/facility where authorized (303 single family dwelling, 135
apartment, 3 multi-dwelling, 119 business, 4 roving, 66 combination, 289

(4) major offenses involved (634 narcotics, 90 racketeering, 66
gambling, 35 homicide/ assault, 16 larceny/theft, 9 kidnapping, 8
bribery, 7 loansharking/usury/extortion, 54 other)

(5) average number of (a) persons intercepted (117), (b) interceptions
(1,861), and (c) incriminating intercepts (347) per order where
interception devices were installed

(6) average cost of interception ($46,492)

(7) type of surveillance used for the 846 interceptions installed (632
telephone, 38 microphone, 113 electronic, 63 combination)

(8) number of persons arrested (2,685) and convicted (607) as the result
of 1992 intercepts

(9) activity taking place during 1992 as the result of intercepts
terminated in years 1982-1991, including number of arrests (1211),
trials (280), motions to suppress that are granted (14), denied (141),
and pending (37), and convictions (1450) (there is a lag between
interceptions, arrests, and convictions, with many arrests and most
convictions associated with a wiretap that terminated in one year taking
place in subsequent years)

Most of the above data is broken down by jurisdiction. Of the 919
authorized intercepts, 340 (37%) were federal. New York State had 197,
New Jersey 111, Florida 80, and Pennsylvania 77. The remaining 114
intercepts were divided among 18 states, none of which had more than 17
intercepts. During the past decade, the average number of authorized
intercepts per year has been about 780.

Individual law enforcement agencies also require internal reports. For
example, the New York Sate Police requires that each week, the Troop or
Detail Captain prepare a report summarizing the status of all
eavesdropping activity within the unit, including the productivity and
plans for each electronic surveillance installation and a brief synopsis
of pertinent activity. This is sent to the New York State Police
Division Headquarters Captain who prepares a report summarizing the
status of all eavesdropping installations.

One of the reasons for the significant amount of post wiretap reporting
is to provide a substantial record for legislatures when considering
whether or not to reenact or modify wiretap statutes.

 3. FISA Interceptions

Title 50 USC, Sections 1801-1811, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) of 1978, covers electronic surveillance for foreign
intelligence purposes (including counterintelligence and
counterterrorism). It governs wire and electronic communications sent by
or intended to be received by United States persons (citizens, aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, corporations, and
associations of U.S. persons) who are in the U.S. when there is a
reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for
law enforcement purposes; nonconsensual wire intercepts that are
implemented within the U.S.; and radio intercepts when the sender and
all receivers are in the U.S. and a warrant would be required for law
enforcement purposes. It does not cover intercepts of U.S. persons who
are overseas (unless the communications are with a U.S. person who is
inside the U.S.). Electronic surveillance conducted under FISA is

FISA authorizes electronic surveillance of foreign powers and agents of
foreign powers for foreign intelligence purposes. Normally, a court
order is required to implement a wiretap under FISA. There are, however,
two exceptions. The first is when the communications are exclusively
between or among foreign powers or involve technical intelligence other
than spoken communications from a location under the open and exclusive
control of a foreign power; there is no substantial risk that the
surveillance will acquire the communications to or from a U.S.person;
and proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth by
the law. Under those conditions, authorization can be granted by the
President through the Attorney General for a period up to one year. The
second is following a declaration of war by Congress. Then the
President, though the Attorney General, can authorize electronic
surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes without a court order for
up to 15 days.

Orders for wiretaps are granted by a special court established by FISA.
The court consists of seven district court judges appointed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. Judges serve seven-year terms.

3.1 Application for a Court Order

Applications for a court order are made by Federal officers and require
approval by the Attorney General. Each application must include:

(1) the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the Attorney General's approval;

(3) the target of the electronic surveillance;

(4) justification that the target is a foreign power or agent of a
foreign power (except no U.S person can be considered a foreign power or
agent thereof solely based on activities protected by the First
Amendment) and that the facilities or places where the surveillance is
be directed will be used by the same;

(5) the proposed minimization procedures, which must meet certain
requirements to protect the privacy of U.S. persons;

(6) the nature of the information sought and type of communications
subjected to surveillance;

(7) certification(s) by the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs or other high-level official in the area of national
security or defense (Presidential appointee subject to Senate
confirmation) that the information sought is foreign intelligence
information and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by
normal investigative methods;

(8) the means by which the surveillance will be effected;

(9) the facts concerning all previous applications involving the same
persons, facilities, or places;

(10) the period of time for the interception (maximum 90 days or, when
the target is a foreign power, one year);

(11) coverage of all surveillance devices to be employed and the
minimization procedures applying to each.

Some of the above information can be omitted when the target is a
foreign power.

Within the FBI, the process of applying for a court order under FISA is
as exacting and subject to review as under Title III. The main
differences are that under FISA, the FBI Intelligence Division is
involved rather than the Criminal Investigative Division, the DOJ Office
of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR) is involved rather than either
the U.S. Attorney's Office or the DOJ Criminal Division, and the
application is approved by the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney
General) rather than by a lower DOJ official.

3.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Before a judge can approve an application, the judge must determine that
the authorizations are valid; that there is probable cause to believe
that the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or
agent of a foreign power and that the facilities or places where the
surveillance is be directed will be used by the same; and that the
proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth in the
law. If the judge approves the application, an order is issued
specifying the relevant information from the application and directing
the communication carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified
person to furnish all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance and to properly maintain under security procedures any
records relating to the surveillance.

3.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation, the Attorney General or designee can
authorize the use of electronic surveillance provided the judge is
notified at the time and an application is made to the judge within 24
hours. If such application is not obtained, then the judge notifies any
U.S. persons named in the application or subject to the surveillance,
though such notification can be postponed or forgone upon showing of
good cause.

3.4 Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Like Title III, FISA places strict controls on what information can be
acquired through electronic surveillance and how such information can be
used. No information can be disclosed for law enforcement purposes
except with the proviso that it may only be used in a criminal
proceedings under advance authorization from the Attorney General. If
the government intends to use such information in court, then the
aggrieved person must be notified in advance. The person may move to
suppress the evidence.

3.5 Reports

Each year, the Attorney General must give the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts (AO) a report of the number of FISA
applications and the number of orders and extensions granted, modified,
or denied. In 1992, there were 484 orders. Since 1979, there has been an
average of a little over 500 FISA orders per year.

Because intercepts conducted under FISA are classified, detailed
information analogous to that required under Title III is not reported
to the AO, nor made available to the public. However, records of
Attorney General certifications, applications, and orders granted must
be held for at least 10 years, and the Attorney General must inform two
Congressional oversight committees of all surveillance activity on a
semiannual basis. These committees are the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on

Advanced TSCM Signals Detection and Analysis
TSCM - Sweeping the Spectrum for Eavesdropping Devices

Any comments or questions regarding this specific page?

Please feel free to sign our Guest Book

E-mail Address  
Web Page
Street Address
City (optional) State Zip
Country (optional)
Phone (optional)
How did you hear about this site or page?
Do you need to have a bug sweep or other TSCM service performed?
Do you need any TSCM equipment?

| Home | What is TSCM | Types of Bugs | Warning Signs You're Bugged |
| How To Behave if Bugged | TSCM Threat Levels | How To Engage a TSCM Firm |
| Qualifications | TSCM Protocol | Bug Frequencies | Phone Taps and Bugging |
| Signal Analysis | TDR Analysis | TDR Tutorial | Wiretapping | Training | Tools |
| Equipment | OSC-5000 | Kaiser | Riser Bond | Avcom | Search Rcvrs |
| Outside Links | Recommended TSCM Books | TSCM Reference Library |
| Recommended U.S. TSCM Firms | TSCM-L Mailing List |


    To be contacted for a confidential consultation
    please E-mail: jmatk@tscm.com

    or send a letter via US Mail to:
    James M. Atkinson
    Granite Island Group
    127 Eastern Avenue #291
    Gloucester, MA 01931-8008

    or call:
    Telephone: (978) 546-3803 / Fax: (978) 546-9467

    URL: http://www.tscm.com/

Copyright ©2002, Granite Island Group