estradiol in livestock panadol osteo availability in uk patent expiry of linezolid fc 600mg tablets in uk clomid best days conceive fungsi obat furosemide 20 mg comprar cialis en miami is it safe to take more than one cialis at a time is tadalafil from india real generic viagra from germany ramipril 10 mg capsule purchase lexapro generic airfast 10 mg montelukast tablets para comprar xenical necesito receta normal price viagra when is it best to take effexor xr viagra for sale nicosia como se usa captopril lexapro generic and tired paxil er 25 mg reviews how many ml of amoxicillin for baby cough will 200 mg of sildenafil hurt proscar 5mg canada use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology mirtazapine order online buy flagyl medication prozac usage by state pantoprazole brands in uae viagra vs generic rf value of ibuprofen in ethyl acetate medicamento generico de seroquel obat ranitidine 300 mg mobica in egypt best way to discontinue paxil cual costo vermox how many mg of nolvadex for gyno is it safe to take 15 mg of lexapro over counter substitute lisinopril nolvadex 20 mg controindicazioni cipro in pakistan buy triamcinolone acetonide cream 0.5 what is the generic for dulcolax domperidone in constipation levothyroxine reviews yahoo lasix furosemide cheapesty without prescription warfarin teaching in tagalog propecia need to order buy amoxicillin without canada amlodipine atenolol brands in india carte sim orange mobicarte prix outlets of kamagra in hyderabad zithromax z pak price without insurance biocon orlistat generic atarax 25 mg street value where to buy kamagra over the counter in manchester atarax 25 mg kilo yaparm? sertraline hcl 50 mg para que sirve dual blade reciprocating saw reviews 50 mg viagra not enough ibuprofen in frühschwangerschaft viagra on prescription cost how much is synthroid at walmart buspirone 5mg reviews carvedilol dose in renal failure pamelor howdotofound online paxil best ocd over the counter pill equivalent to nexium keflex suspension 250 mg pediatrico was ist anafranil 25 mg what is the best kind of viagra over counter levitra at walmart non prescription amoxicillin liquid sildenafil 50 ml buy over the counter dose ibuprofen cheap cialis overnight no prescription provera ukradenih vozila cost of phenytoin without insurance prednisone tapering schedule from 50 mg day delivery from same usa viagra sumatriptan succinate 50 mg side effects is zantac contraindicated in pregnancy tacrolimus market buy viagra like covent garden buy lexapro online cheap ibuprofen in 3 month old metronidazole 400 mg and amoxicillin is it safe to take amoxicillin and drink what is the difference in daily and 36 hour cialis what is the price of misoprostol tablet in hyderabad tapering prednisone from 20 mg order 6 month supply of tadalafil 20 mg clonidine use in opioid withdrawal lexapro 10 mg ocd kann man viagra in deutschland rezeptfrei kaufen cephalexin 500 mg para que es glass in atorvastatin calcium nystatin triamcinolone cream usage clomiphene men over counter lexapro generic lose weight estradiol baownbeuv reviews asacol tablet in stool diflucan safe nursing prednisone 5 mg 12 day dose pack instructions viagra delivered next day in kl motrin dosage in toddlers tamoxifeno causa amenorrea floxing research by johanne dubail in genesis is 40 mg prednisone a high dose kamagra 100 chewable op review anybody know how much does cialis cost at walgreens lasix water pill where can i buy in england cialis 5 mg precios de cialis generico metronidazole price walgreens dexamethasone in nose does topamax cause ringing in the ears uses for cefdinir 250 mg caverta generic viagra china us best fake viagra ring lisinopril generic or name brand cialis comprar costo del medicamento priligy en mexico spironolactone dose in heart failure viagra across border in usa how much ibuprofen is safe long term where do i buy viagra in naproxen and swelling in knee is there a generic form of strattera strattera kapsül 10 mg 2.5 mg prednisone daily can metoprolol 25 mg will kill you lamisil 250 mg tablet fiyati does ampicillin have sulfa in it ovral contraceptive pills in india how much does cialis cost per pill cvs are macrobid antibiotics safe during pregnancy is viagra really needed online voltaren generic drug rovex nexium reels reviews zovirax comprimido comprar dosage of diflucan in yeast infection buy cheap 20 mg lisinopril fast lexapro generic cost at walmart buy tamoxifen online no prescription ibuprofen age to buy uk aripiprazole discount can you die from 200 mg of benadryl amoxicillin 500 mg untuk when can cialis become generic can lisinopril 40 mg be cut in half keflex 500 mg def50 nebenwirkungen von clopidogrel 75 mg purchase zyban guercmorteo taking 30 mg of prednisone for 6 weeks acyclovir and penciclovir cream india metformin in treatment of gestational diabetes singulair 4 mg dosis what is a safe amount of naproxen to take allegra substitute over counter claritin user review clomiphene citrate mode of action in urdu.com fluconazole dosage in tinea capitis empresas que realizan actos de comercio what is the cost of zyban price of acyclovir in greece panadol safe take while pregnant lumont montelukast 4mg price preis xenical bestellen can i cut zyrtec in half kamagra uk diazepam suprax 400 mg prospect azithromycin in h pylori azathioprine brands generic lexapro made premarin 0.625 mg tablets propecia cost for generic panadol cold price price zithromax liquid for cats is viagra legal in japan clonidine name in mexico cheap viagra rx buying viagra online with a mastercard how long is it safe to stay on zoloft walgreens lamisil price the maximum dose of cialis and viagra that is safe ibuprofen side effects uk how many mgs are the pink nolvadex seroquel 100 mg daily coumadin orders estrace baownbeuv australia how many mg can i take for cialis prednisone taper schedule from 60 mgs how much does lexapro cost out of pocket is buying viagra on the street illegal is it safe to take lipitor cialis prices at shoppers drugmart in canada prices of nexium minocin 100 mg precio mexico clomid nolvadex buy azithromycin 500 brand name metoprolol orion 190 mg nizoral shampoo in nigeria price montelukast kastair 10 mg tablet phil metronidazole discus uk cut metoprolol er in half nexium 40 mg maag viagra available in dhaka order xenical online canadian resident the use of metronidazole in pregnancy disulfiram tqeovertoz for sale how much does generic viagra cost at walmart metoprolol acts on b1 receptors in the heart to phenazopyridine hydrochloride use in dogs is 10 mg of cialis the same as 10 mg of viagra how to buy viagran in lahore tadalafil 20 mg cut in half best dose amitriptyline ic cefuroxime axetil 500 mg 1000 mg ibuprofen too much best time of day to take evista is it kinnickee in the cialis commercial when will there be a generic for avodart ph cycle generic nolvadex what is the best site for viagra is it safe to take 1600 mg of skelaxin prevacid okay in pregnancy buy amoxicillin off the shelf zovirax ointment order safest website to buy viagra cialis generic identifier cialis patent india best foods with warfarin allegra cangelosi research documented in harmful algae viagra in india, delhi how much does viagra cost at shopko methotrexate price uae effects of 30 mg paxil can you buy generic viagra through pharmacy walkin 100 mg zoloft not working what is the brand name for permethrin sildenafil 100 mg haltbarkeit what is ropinirole 2 mg used for tomar viagra 25 mg prices for flovent inhaler is it legal to bring viagra into usa tadalafil tablets 10 mg side effects generic lamisil mexico order liquid arimidex simvastatin zocor cost edinburgh uk viagra search cialis charles albuterol inhalation solution cost can metronidazole treat entamoeba histolytica safely brand ibuprofen dissolves most quickly water effects of cephalexin in pregnant women purchase viagra without prescription is cialis safe to take with clonidine azithromycin ratiopharm 250 mg kalvop??llysteinen buy cialis on line from canada cialis soft tabs in ?sterreich olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and amlodipine 5 mg viagra in ur system finasteride side effects india benadryl safe 4 month old best price cialis usa para que sirve el danazol de 200 mg acyclovir salep lengkap sale of doxycycline meclizine 25 mg tab side effects buying viagra on line is it safe zyprexa class action canada depakote ec 125 mg naproxen 375 over the counter reliable kamagra supplier uk obat alloris loratadine 10 mg where to buy levitra in cape town strattera reviews college students buying premarin canada 850 mg metformin twice a day is milk thistle safe to take with methotrexate how much is albuterol mdi cost adalat nasibov papers in soco virtual reality pixel vacanze a cipro in settembre overnight delivery zithromax comprar disulfiram espana buy sucralfate 1 gm cataflam cost bactrim acne treatment reviews viagra in my drink do you need prescription to buy viagra best viagra prices for 100 mg 150mg generic viagra fastest shipping foods rich in vitamin k warfarin 5 mg propecia descriptions why amitriptyline hydrochloride is used in urdu how long does luvox stay in your body medicament aldactone 75 mg how to wean off metoprolol 50 mg tablet er ketoconazole liquid dogs chinese viagra over the counter london purchase clomid pct albuterol and pregnancy and safety paroxetine sale annual sales of actos is it safe to take adderall and prozac together pantoprazole sodium sesquihydrate 40 mg vs nexium 20 mg is tenormin a brand name ukkamagra review liquid benadryl on skin buy allegra online canada 0.015 mg ethinyl estradiol how much does propecia cost in the uk will 5 mg cialis work first time can take amoxicillin 500 mg while breastfeeding prozac in bloodstream order renova from canada generic version ciprofloxacin viagra price shopper donde puedo comprar la cytotec en honduras generic levothyroxine fillers buy brandcialis usa online pharmacy give liquid benadryl to dogs should use generic viagra tacrolimus in sle allegra via research in bib by aidan budd data mining prednisone 20 mg 3 tabs daily for 7 days feldene 20 mg inyectable viagra online euro what is the brand name for albendazole sites buy viagra will taking 40 mg. of cialis harm me why price increase amitriptyline can levothyroxine cause ringing in the ears carvedilol api price in india many mg prednisone give dog difference between generic brand name effexor how to take liquid amoxicillin ciprofloxacina 750 mg cytotec side effect and how to counter it buy metformin and clomid canada online generic name of misoprostol cialis levitra staxyn and viagra prices buy 40 mg generic levitra online albuterol mdi inhaler for sale where to purchase viagra in person prozac lump in throat xenical uk sale lansoprazole peptac liquid buy promethazine with codeine syrup online atorvastatin 40 mg ndc plavix in elderly considerations ibuprofen 100 mg für kinder best time to take celexa to prevent insomnia finasteride average price buy valtrex online with no prescription best price propecia buy isotretinoin online uk omeprazole 20 mg rx rhinocort safe during breastfeeding generic drug zyrtec d can i take viagra with me to usa clomid supplements for sale nz can you drink alcohol omeprazole 20 mg allegra 120 mg dosagem best time for nexium i accidentally took 1600 mg of ibuprofen where can you buy viagra over the counter in singapore how often can i take 500 mg of naproxen comprar cialis generico online seguro discount coupons simvastatin methocarbamol baownbeuv for sale omeprazole arrow 10 mg lamisil ointment for ringworm buy it over the counter generic viagra safe or not glucophage in stool zovirax invisiseal patch review where to purchase permethrin spray kamagra 100 mg les effet levothyroxine rowcmoadreders cost allegra tabletas de 180 mg info on glass in generic lisinopril sumycin howdotofound price how long does antibiotic bactrim stay in your system cost of quetiapine uk maxalt europe flagyl metronidazole over counter what is abilify 2 mg used for herbal viagra women reviews nitroglycerin spray over the counter what is loratadine tablets 10 mg nizoral shampoo compare prices flagyl eciwlcodkedefe online theophylline brands in pakistan flagyl side effects blood in urine cialis super force review when can i see results from generic finasteride what is the best time to take cialis safely coming off paxil is it safe to take keflex if allergic to penicillin loratadine uk boots wo kamagra online kaufen diflucan price in philippines celebrex 100 mg para q sirve is it safe to take cialis for fun colchicine in gout treatment cetirizine brands uk lipitor 20 mg efeitos colaterais clomid use in women who ovulate what is fluconazole tablet 150 mg used for bystolic 5 mg side effect diflucan costs prednisone injection in nerve is seroquel safe for pregnant women is prevacid sold over the counter in canada sildenafil india 25 cents nexium over the counter substitute valtrex rezeptfrei kaufen aciclovir genfar 800 mg where do you buy viagra in south africa tapering prednisone at 5 mg bebes sanos despues de usar cytotec order xenical in india cash on delivery viagra canadian paypal ranitidine 150 mg for babies where to buy real viagra cialis online best pcos metformin hydrochloride 500 mg inderal 2.5 mg and pulse inhibitor rosuvastatin generic 40 mg orlistat 120 mg buy what is ciprofloxacin generic for custom heating specialist in richmond va remeron 30 mg yorum betamethasone in dogs como usar cytotec para aborto de siete semanas usage for ketoconazole cream and acne generic drug crestor clomiphene citrate 50 mg tab for men prednisone without prescription in america ciprofloxacin al 500 mg dosierung walgreens lipitor generic price azithromycin 1000 mg single dose side effects dose of prednisolone in infantile spasm phenergan in toddlers ho usato cialis rite aid brand allegra cyclophosphamide manufacturer in india strattera per paypal kaufen where can i buy real cipla viagra order cialis 10mg 30 tabs low dose naltrexone in india ibuprofen hatásmechanizmusa how many ibuprofen can put you in the hospital singulair costco 10mg counterfeit finasteride buy valtrex baownbeuv release date of plavix generic doxycycline hyclate para que se usa cost of viagra without insurance at rite aid skil reciprocating saw review excipient in amoxicillin is taking 3 dulcolax safe finasteride 5 mg does it work metoclopramide hydrochloride over counter price for terbinafine hcl 30 ccw reciprocity agreements between states buying tamoxifen online prednisone dose in urticaria nitroglycerin tablets cotton in bottle ibuprofen poisoning in dogs and cats omeprazole 20 mg dzialanie amoxicillin 3 capsule dose indian name estrace hereisthebestin discount cataflam aerosol como usar bystolic generic form metronidazole 250 mg dose men in black 3 viagra why did levitra change prices at walmart avodart 0.5 mg soft gel side effects is 10 mg accutane enough viagra australia delivery paypal tadalafil price walmart lisinopril 20 mg generico en mexico side effects micardis 20 mg metoprolol tartrate generic colchicine price in the philippines pfizer viagra cost in india meloxicam dose in dog metronidazole for bv in india metallic taste in mouth accutane how long does 2 g of azithromycin stay in your system trental 400 mg controindicazioni can you give a dog in pain ibuprofen where can one get dostinex drug in nigeria and prize lisinopril mg morning evening best time take kamagrafast customer reviews australia accutane para que serve o remedio meloxicam 0 5 mg cem products liquid cialis bupropion xl 300 mg zydus tetracycline safe plants generico de augmentin 12h medicina enalapril 20 mg
WIRETAP LAWS AND PROCEDURES
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE  U.S. GOVERNMENT TAPS A LINE


Donald P. Delaney, 
Senior Investigator New York State Police

Dorothy E. Denning, 
Professor and Chair Computer Science Department, Georgetown University

John Kaye, County Prosecutor Monmouth County, New Jersey

Alan R. McDonald, 
Special Assistant to the Assistant Director Technical Services Division, FBI

1. Introduction

Although wiretaps are generally illegal in the United States, the
federal government and the governments of thirty seven states have been
authorized through federal and state legislation to intercept wire and
electronic communications under certain stringent rules which include
obtaining a court order. These rules have been designed to ensure the
protection of individual privacy and Fourth Amendment rights, while
permitting the use of wiretaps for investigations of serious criminal
activity and for foreign intelligence.

This article describes the legal requirements for government
interceptions of wire and electronic communications and some of the
additional procedures and practices followed by federal and state
agencies. The legal requirements are rooted in two pieces of federal
legislation: the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III
of the Act (hereafter "Title III")), passed in 1968, and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), passed in 1978. Title III
established the basic law for federal and state law enforcement
interceptions performed for the purpose of criminal investigations,
while FISA established the law for federal-level interceptions performed
for intelligence and counterintelligence operations. We will first
describe Title III interceptions and then describe FISA interceptions.

 2. Title III Interceptions

Title III, as amended (particularly by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986), is codified at Title 18 USC, Sections 2510-2521.
These statutes provide privacy protection for and govern the
interception of oral, wire, and electronic communications. Title III
covers all telephone communications regardless of the medium, except
that it does not cover the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the handset and base unit. The
law authorizes the interception of oral, wire, and electronic
communications by investigative and law enforcement officers conducting
criminal investigations pertaining to serious criminal offenses, i.e.,
felonies, following the issuance of a court order by a judge. The Title
III law authorizes the interception of particular criminal
communications related to particular criminal offenses. In short, it
authorizes the acquisition of evidence of crime. It does not authorize
noncriminal intelligence gathering, nor does it authorize interceptions
related to social or political views.

Thirty seven states have statutes permitting interceptions by state and
local law enforcement officers for certain types of criminal
investigations. All of the state statutes are based upon Title III from
which they are derivative. These statutes must be at least as
restrictive as Title III, and in fact most are more restrictive in their
requirements. In describing the legal requirements, we will focus on
those of Title III since they define the baseline for all wiretaps
performed by federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

In recent years, state statutes have been modified to keep pace with
rapid technological advances in telecommunications. For example, New
Jersey amended its electronic surveillance statute in 1993 to include
cellular telephones, cordless telephones, digital display beepers, fax
transmissions, computer-to-computer communications, and traces obtained
through "caller-ID".

Wiretaps are limited to the crimes specified in Title III and state
statutes. In New Jersey, the list includes murder, kidnapping, gambling,
robbery, bribery, aggravated assault, wrongful credit practices,
terrorist threats, arson, burglary, felony thefts, escape, forgery,
narcotics trafficking, firearms trafficking, racketeering, and organized
crime.

Most wiretaps are large undertakings, requiring a substantial use of
resources. In 1992, the average cost of installing intercept devices and
monitoring communications was $46,492. Despite budget constraints and
personnel shortages, law enforcement conducts wiretaps as necessary, but
obviously, because of staffing and costs, judiciously.

2.1 Application for a Court Order

All government wiretaps require a court order based upon a detailed
showing of probable cause. To obtain a court order, a three-step process
is involved. First, the law enforcement officer responsible for the
investigation must draw up a detailed affidavit showing that there is
probable cause to believe that the target telephone is being used to
facilitate a specific, serious, indictable crime.

Second, an attorney for the federal, state, or local government must
work with the law enforcement officer to prepare an application for a
court order, based upon the officer's affidavit. At the federal level,
the application must be approved by the Attorney General, Deputy
Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, any Assistant Attorney
General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant
Attorney General in the Criminal Division designated by the Attorney
General. At the state and local level, the application must be made and
approved by the principal prosecuting attorney of the state (State
Attorney General) or political subdivision thereof (District Attorney or
County Prosecutor). The attorney must be authorized by a statute of that
state to make such applications.

Third, the attorney must present the approved application ex parte
(without an adversary hearing) to a federal or state judge who is
authorized to issue a court order for electronic surveillance. A state
or local police officer or federal law enforcement agent cannot make an
application for a court order directly to a judge.

Typically, a court order is requested after a lengthy investigation and
the use of a "Dialed Number Recorder" (DNR). The DNR is used to track
the outgoing calls from the suspect's phone in order to demonstrate that
the suspect is communicating with known criminals.

Title III requires that an application for a court order specify:

(a) the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application
and the high-level government attorney authorizing the application;

(b) the facts and circumstances of the case justifying the application,
including details of the particular offense under investigation, the
identity of the person committing it, the type of communications sought,
and the nature and location of the communication facilities;

(c) whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and
failed or why they would likely fail or be too dangerous;

(d) the period of time for the interception (at most 30 days -
extensions may be permitted upon reapplication);

(e) the facts concerning all previous applications involving any of the
same persons or facilities;

(f) where the application is for the extension of an order, the results
thus far obtained from the interception.

The process of making an application for a court order is further
restricted by internal procedures adopted by law enforcement agencies to
ensure that wiretaps conform to the laws and are used only when
justified. The following describes the process for the FBI and the New
York State Police.

2.1.1 FBI Applications

In order for an FBI agent to conduct an interception, the agent must
follow procedures that go well beyond the legal requirements imposed by
Title III and which involve extensive internal review. In preparing the
affidavit, the FBI agent in the field works with the field office
principal legal advisor and also with an attorney in the local U.S.
Attorney's Office, revising the documentation to take into account their
comments and suggestions. After the documents are approved by field
office management, they are submitted to the Department of Justice's
Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) in the Criminal Division and to
the FBI Headquarters (HQ). At FBI HQ, the documents go to the Legal
Counsel Division (LCD) and the Criminal Investigative Division (CID).
Within the CID, they are sent to the program manager of the criminal
program unit relating to the type of violation under investigation,
e.g., organized crime. The program manager determines whether the
subjects of the proposed interception are worthy targets of
investigation and whether the interception is worth doing. Attorneys in
the FBI's LCD and the DOJ's OEO further refine the documents.

After the documents are approved by the DOJ's OEO and by FBI HQ, they
are referred to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or above), who
reviews the documents and signs off on them. At this point, the DOJ
authorizes the local U.S. Attorney's Office to file the final version of
the documents (application, affidavit, court order, and service provider
order) in court. The U.S. Attorney's Office then submits the documents
and the DOJ authorization to a federal judge. The entire process can
take as long as a month.

The following summarizes the people and organizations involved in the
preparation or approval of the application and the issuance of a court
order:

1. FBI agent
2. FBI field office attorney (principal legal advisor)
3. FBI field office management
4. Attorney in local U.S. Attorney's office
5. DOJ Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO)
6. FBI HQ Legal Counsel Division (LCD)
7. FBI HQ Criminal Investigative Division (CID)
8. DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General (or higher)
9. Federal District Court judge


 2.1.2 New York State Police Applications

Within the New York State Police, electronic surveillance is conducted
by Senior Investigators in the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
In preparing an affidavit, the investigator works with the District
Attorney's Office (or, in the case of a federal investigation, the U.S.
Attorney's office) and with the BCI Captain of the investigator's troop.
(Wiretap applications can be made and approved by the State Attorney
General, but this is unusual.) The Captain assesses whether review by
Division Headquarters is necessary and confers with the Assistant Deputy
Superintendent (ADS) or Headquarters Captain for final determination. If
Headquarters review is deemed necessary, then all documentation is sent
to the ADS along with a memorandum, endorsed by the Troop Unit
Supervisor and the Troop or Detail Commander, requesting approval. If
Headquarters review is deemed unnecessary, then the memo is sent without
the documentation. Once the ADS and District Attorney (DA) approve the
application, the DA submits the application to a judge who grants or
denies the court order.

2.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Not all judges have the authority to grant court orders for wiretaps. In
New Jersey, for example, only eight judges are designated as "wiretap
judges" for the entire state. These judges are given special training to
be sensitive to personal rights of privacy and to recognize the
importance of telephone intercepts for law enforcement.

Before a judge can approve an application for electronic surveillance
and issue a court order, the judge must determine that:

(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing,
has committed, or is about to commit an offense covered by the law;

(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications
concerning that offense will be obtained through such interception;

(c) normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or
reasonably appear unlikely to succeed or to be too dangerous;

(d) there is probable cause for belief that the facilities from which,
or the place where the communications are to be intercepted are being
used, or are about to be used, in connection with the commission of such
offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
such person.

In addition to showing probable cause, one of the main criterion for
determining whether a court order should be issued is whether normal
investigative techniques have been or are likely to be unsuccessful
(criterion (c) above). Electronic surveillance is a tool of last resort
and cannot be used if other methods of investigation could reasonably be
used instead. Such normal investigative methods usually include visual
surveillance, interviewing subjects, the use of informers, telephone
record analysis, and DNRs. However, these techniques often have limited
impact on an investigation. Continuous surveillance by police can create
suspicion and therefore be hazardous; further, it cannot disclose the
contents of telephone conversations. Questioning identified suspects or
executing search warrants at their residence can substantially
jeopardize an investigation before the full scope of the operation is
revealed, and information can be lost through interpretation. Informants
are useful and sought out by police, but the information they provide
does not always reveal all of the players or the extent of an operation,
and great care must be taken to ensure that the informants are
protected. Moreover, because informants are often criminals themselves,
they may not be believed in court. Telephone record analysis and DNRs
are helpful, but do not reveal the contents of conversations or the
identities of parties. Other methods of investigation that may be tried
include undercover operations and stings. But while effective in some
cases, undercover operations are difficult and dangerous, and stings do
not always work.

If the judge approves the application, then a court order is issued
specifying the relevant information given in the application, namely,
the identity of the person (if known) whose communications are to be
intercepted, the nature and location of the communication facilities,
the type of communication to be intercepted and the offense to which it
relates, the agency authorized to perform the interception and the
person authorizing the application, and the period of time during which
such interception is authorized. A court order may also require that
interim status reports be made to the issuing judge while the wiretap is
in progress.

2.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation where there is immediate danger of death or
serious physical injury to any person, or conspiratorial activities
threatening national security or characteristic of organized crime,
Title III permits any investigative or law enforcement officer specially
designated by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or the
Associate Attorney General, or by the principal prosecuting attorney of
any state or subdivision thereof, to intercept communications provided
an application for a court order is made within 48 hours. In the event a
court order is not issued, the contents of any intercepted communication
is treated as having been obtained in violation of Title III.

In New York State, even an emergency situation requires a court order
from a judge. However, the judge may grant a temporary court order based
on an oral application from the District Attorney. The oral
communication must be recorded and transcribed, and must be followed by
a written application within 24 hours. The duration of a temporary
warrant cannot exceed 24 hours and cannot be renewed except through a
written application.

2.4 Execution of a Court Order

2.4.1 Installation of a Wiretap

To execute a court order for a wiretap, the investigative or law
enforcement officer takes the court order or emergency provision to the
communications service provider. Normally, the service provider is the
local exchange carrier. When served with a court order, the service
provider (or landlord, custodian, or other person named) is mandated
under Title III to assist in the execution of the interception by
providing all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance. The service provider is compensated for reasonable expenses
incurred. In light of rapid technological developments including
cellular telephones and integrated computer networks, the New Jersey
statute also requires the service provider to give technical assistance
and equipment to fulfill the court order. This requirement has not yet
been tested in court.

Normally, the government leases a line from the service provider and the
intercepted communications are transmitted to a remote government
monitoring facility over that line. In many cases, the bridging
connection is made within the service provider's central office
facility. Alternatively, a law enforcement agency may request the
service provider to give the "pairs and appearances" (a place to connect
to the suspect's line) in the "local loop" for the suspect's phone. A
law enforcement technician then makes the connection.

When a suspect's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the
person is attempting to evade or thwart interception), then a "roving"
wiretap, which suspends the specification of the telephone, may be used.
In this case, prior to intercepting communications, the officer must use
some other method of surveillance in order to determine the exact
location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. Once
determined, the location or telephone number is given to the service
provider for coordination and prompt assistance. The officer may not
intercept communications randomly in order to track a person (random or
mass surveillance is not permitted under any circumstances).

2.4.2 Minimization

Once any electronic surveillance begins, the law enforcement officer
must "minimize" -- that is, attempt to limit the interception of
communications to the specified offenses in the court order. Prior to
the surveillance, a federal or state attorney holds a "minimization
meeting" with the investigators who will be participating in the case to
ensure that the rules are followed.

Minimization is normally accomplished by turning off the intercept and
then performing a spot check every few minutes to determine if the
conversation has turned to the subject of the court order. This avoids
picking up family gossip. Special problems may arise where criminals
communicate in codes that are designed to conceal criminal activity in
what sounds like mundane household discussion. If an intercepted
communication is in a code or foreign language, and if someone is not
reasonably available to interpret the code or foreign language, then the
conversation can be recorded and minimization deferred until an expert
in that code or language is available to interpret the communication.
Should a wiretap fail to meet the minimization parameters, all of the
evidence obtained from the wiretap could be inadmissible.

2.4.3 Recording

All intercepted communications are to be recorded when possible. As a
practical mater, law enforcement officers make working copies of the
original tapes. In many instances at the state and local level, the
originals are delivered to the prosecutor's office and maintained in the
prosecutor's custody. The copies are screened by the case officer for
pertinent conversations (e.g., "I'll deliver the dope at 8:00 pm."). A
compilation of the relevant conversations, together with the
corroboratory surveillances often provides the probable cause for search
warrants and/or arrest warrants.

2.4.4 Termination of Electronic Surveillance

Electronic surveillance must terminate upon attainment of the
objectives, or in any event within 30 days. To continue an interception
beyond 30 days, the officer, through a government attorney, must apply
for and be granted an extension based upon a new application and court
order.

When the period of a court order, or extension thereof, expires, the
original tapes must be made available to the issuing judge and sealed
under court supervision. The tapes must be maintained in such fashion
for 10 years.

2.5 Notification and Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Upon termination of an interception, the judge who issued the court
order must notify the persons named in the order that the interception
took place. Normally, this must be done within 90 days, but it may be
postponed upon showing of good cause. If the judge determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to make portions of the intercepted
communications available to the subjects, the judge may do so.

The contents of the communications may not be used as evidence in any
trial or hearing unless each party has received a copy of the
application and court order at least 10 days in advance of the trial,
and has been given the opportunity to move to suppress the evidence. A
motion to suppress the evidence may be made on the grounds that it was
not obtained in complete conformance with the laws.

2.6 Reports

Within 30 days after the expiration or denial of a court order, Title
III requires that the judge provide information about the order to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO). Each year the
Attorney General (or a designated Assistant Attorney General) must
report, on behalf of the federal government, to the AO a summary of all
orders and interceptions for the year; reports for state and local
jurisdictions are made by the principal prosecuting attorney of the
jurisdiction. The AO then integrates these summaries into an annual
report: "Report on Applications for Orders Authorizing or Approving the
Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications (Wiretap
Report)" covering all federal and state electronic surveillance,
including wiretaps. The 1992 report is about 200 pages and includes
information about each interception authorized in 1992, update
information for interceptions authorized in 1982-1991, and summary
statistics. The summary statistics include the following data (numbers
in parenthesis are the 1992 figures):

(1) number of interceptions authorized (919), denied (0), and installed
(846)

(2) average duration (in days) of original authorization (28) and
extensions (30)

(3) the place/facility where authorized (303 single family dwelling, 135
apartment, 3 multi-dwelling, 119 business, 4 roving, 66 combination, 289
other)

(4) major offenses involved (634 narcotics, 90 racketeering, 66
gambling, 35 homicide/ assault, 16 larceny/theft, 9 kidnapping, 8
bribery, 7 loansharking/usury/extortion, 54 other)

(5) average number of (a) persons intercepted (117), (b) interceptions
(1,861), and (c) incriminating intercepts (347) per order where
interception devices were installed

(6) average cost of interception ($46,492)

(7) type of surveillance used for the 846 interceptions installed (632
telephone, 38 microphone, 113 electronic, 63 combination)

(8) number of persons arrested (2,685) and convicted (607) as the result
of 1992 intercepts

(9) activity taking place during 1992 as the result of intercepts
terminated in years 1982-1991, including number of arrests (1211),
trials (280), motions to suppress that are granted (14), denied (141),
and pending (37), and convictions (1450) (there is a lag between
interceptions, arrests, and convictions, with many arrests and most
convictions associated with a wiretap that terminated in one year taking
place in subsequent years)

Most of the above data is broken down by jurisdiction. Of the 919
authorized intercepts, 340 (37%) were federal. New York State had 197,
New Jersey 111, Florida 80, and Pennsylvania 77. The remaining 114
intercepts were divided among 18 states, none of which had more than 17
intercepts. During the past decade, the average number of authorized
intercepts per year has been about 780.

Individual law enforcement agencies also require internal reports. For
example, the New York Sate Police requires that each week, the Troop or
Detail Captain prepare a report summarizing the status of all
eavesdropping activity within the unit, including the productivity and
plans for each electronic surveillance installation and a brief synopsis
of pertinent activity. This is sent to the New York State Police
Division Headquarters Captain who prepares a report summarizing the
status of all eavesdropping installations.

One of the reasons for the significant amount of post wiretap reporting
is to provide a substantial record for legislatures when considering
whether or not to reenact or modify wiretap statutes.

 3. FISA Interceptions

Title 50 USC, Sections 1801-1811, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) of 1978, covers electronic surveillance for foreign
intelligence purposes (including counterintelligence and
counterterrorism). It governs wire and electronic communications sent by
or intended to be received by United States persons (citizens, aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, corporations, and
associations of U.S. persons) who are in the U.S. when there is a
reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required for
law enforcement purposes; nonconsensual wire intercepts that are
implemented within the U.S.; and radio intercepts when the sender and
all receivers are in the U.S. and a warrant would be required for law
enforcement purposes. It does not cover intercepts of U.S. persons who
are overseas (unless the communications are with a U.S. person who is
inside the U.S.). Electronic surveillance conducted under FISA is
classified.

FISA authorizes electronic surveillance of foreign powers and agents of
foreign powers for foreign intelligence purposes. Normally, a court
order is required to implement a wiretap under FISA. There are, however,
two exceptions. The first is when the communications are exclusively
between or among foreign powers or involve technical intelligence other
than spoken communications from a location under the open and exclusive
control of a foreign power; there is no substantial risk that the
surveillance will acquire the communications to or from a U.S.person;
and proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth by
the law. Under those conditions, authorization can be granted by the
President through the Attorney General for a period up to one year. The
second is following a declaration of war by Congress. Then the
President, though the Attorney General, can authorize electronic
surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes without a court order for
up to 15 days.

Orders for wiretaps are granted by a special court established by FISA.
The court consists of seven district court judges appointed by the Chief
Justice of the United States. Judges serve seven-year terms.

3.1 Application for a Court Order

Applications for a court order are made by Federal officers and require
approval by the Attorney General. Each application must include:

(1) the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the Attorney General's approval;

(3) the target of the electronic surveillance;

(4) justification that the target is a foreign power or agent of a
foreign power (except no U.S person can be considered a foreign power or
agent thereof solely based on activities protected by the First
Amendment) and that the facilities or places where the surveillance is
be directed will be used by the same;

(5) the proposed minimization procedures, which must meet certain
requirements to protect the privacy of U.S. persons;

(6) the nature of the information sought and type of communications
subjected to surveillance;

(7) certification(s) by the Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs or other high-level official in the area of national
security or defense (Presidential appointee subject to Senate
confirmation) that the information sought is foreign intelligence
information and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by
normal investigative methods;

(8) the means by which the surveillance will be effected;

(9) the facts concerning all previous applications involving the same
persons, facilities, or places;

(10) the period of time for the interception (maximum 90 days or, when
the target is a foreign power, one year);

(11) coverage of all surveillance devices to be employed and the
minimization procedures applying to each.

Some of the above information can be omitted when the target is a
foreign power.

Within the FBI, the process of applying for a court order under FISA is
as exacting and subject to review as under Title III. The main
differences are that under FISA, the FBI Intelligence Division is
involved rather than the Criminal Investigative Division, the DOJ Office
of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR) is involved rather than either
the U.S. Attorney's Office or the DOJ Criminal Division, and the
application is approved by the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney
General) rather than by a lower DOJ official.

3.2 Issuance of a Court Order

Before a judge can approve an application, the judge must determine that
the authorizations are valid; that there is probable cause to believe
that the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or
agent of a foreign power and that the facilities or places where the
surveillance is be directed will be used by the same; and that the
proposed minimization procedures meet the requirements set forth in the
law. If the judge approves the application, an order is issued
specifying the relevant information from the application and directing
the communication carrier, landlord, custodian, or other specified
person to furnish all necessary information, facilities, and technical
assistance and to properly maintain under security procedures any
records relating to the surveillance.

3.3 Emergencies

In an emergency situation, the Attorney General or designee can
authorize the use of electronic surveillance provided the judge is
notified at the time and an application is made to the judge within 24
hours. If such application is not obtained, then the judge notifies any
U.S. persons named in the application or subject to the surveillance,
though such notification can be postponed or forgone upon showing of
good cause.

3.4 Use of Intercepted Communications as Evidence

Like Title III, FISA places strict controls on what information can be
acquired through electronic surveillance and how such information can be
used. No information can be disclosed for law enforcement purposes
except with the proviso that it may only be used in a criminal
proceedings under advance authorization from the Attorney General. If
the government intends to use such information in court, then the
aggrieved person must be notified in advance. The person may move to
suppress the evidence.

3.5 Reports

Each year, the Attorney General must give the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts (AO) a report of the number of FISA
applications and the number of orders and extensions granted, modified,
or denied. In 1992, there were 484 orders. Since 1979, there has been an
average of a little over 500 FISA orders per year.

Because intercepts conducted under FISA are classified, detailed
information analogous to that required under Title III is not reported
to the AO, nor made available to the public. However, records of
Attorney General certifications, applications, and orders granted must
be held for at least 10 years, and the Attorney General must inform two
Congressional oversight committees of all surveillance activity on a
semiannual basis. These committees are the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence.


Advanced TSCM Signals Detection and Analysis
TSCM - Sweeping the Spectrum for Eavesdropping Devices

Any comments or questions regarding this specific page?

Please feel free to sign our Guest Book

Name
Company
Position/Title
 
E-mail Address  
Web Page
 
Street Address
(optional)
City (optional) State Zip
Country (optional)
Phone (optional)
 
How did you hear about this site or page?
Do you need to have a bug sweep or other TSCM service performed?
Do you need any TSCM equipment?
 
Comments



| Home | What is TSCM | Types of Bugs | Warning Signs You're Bugged |
| How To Behave if Bugged | TSCM Threat Levels | How To Engage a TSCM Firm |
| Qualifications | TSCM Protocol | Bug Frequencies | Phone Taps and Bugging |
| Signal Analysis | TDR Analysis | TDR Tutorial | Wiretapping | Training | Tools |
| Equipment | OSC-5000 | Kaiser | Riser Bond | Avcom | Search Rcvrs |
| Outside Links | Recommended TSCM Books | TSCM Reference Library |
| Recommended U.S. TSCM Firms | TSCM-L Mailing List |


-----------------------

    To be contacted for a confidential consultation
    please E-mail: jmatk@tscm.com

    or send a letter via US Mail to:
    James M. Atkinson
    Granite Island Group
    127 Eastern Avenue #291
    Gloucester, MA 01931-8008

    or call:
    Telephone: (978) 546-3803 / Fax: (978) 546-9467

    URL: http://www.tscm.com/

Copyright ©2002, Granite Island Group